Rationale and Design of the Women and Inclusion in Academic Medicine Study

Bibliographic Data

ID15315225
AuthorsEmorcia V Hill (Harvard University, corresponding author), Michael J C Wake, Michael Wake, René Carapinha, Sharon‐Lise T Normand (0000-0001-7027-4769), Sharon-Lise Normand, Robert Wolf (0000-0001-5069-1709, Harvard University), Robert E Wolf, Keith C Norris (0000-0003-3071-0700, University of California, Los Angeles), Keith Norris, Joan Y Reede
Year2016
Volume26
Issue2
Pages245-245
Publication date2016-04-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEthnicity & Disease (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1049-510X • E-ISSN: 1945-0826
PublisherEthnicity & Disease, Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.18865/ed.26.2.245
PMID27103776
OpenAlexW2336252609
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited12

We describe the design, methods, rationale and limitations of one of the largest and most comprehensive studies of women faculty in academic medicine with a focus on WOC. This study will enhance our understanding of challenges that face women, and, especially WOC, faculty in academic medicine and will provide solutions at both the individual and institutional levels

Academic medicine · Focus group · Grounded theory · Inclusion (mineral · Medical education · Qualitative property · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociocultural evolution · Sociology · Survey data collection · Diversity and Career in Medicine · Medical Education and Admissions · Medicine · Mentoring and Academic Development · Psychology · Social Psychology · Gerontology

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access