Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Advancing Species Protection With a Revised Agency Mission

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and Assessment '87

Bibliographic Data

ID15326831
AuthorsEmily W Ruell (0000-0002-9990-264X, Colorado State University, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume18
Issue3
Pages208-218
Publication date2013-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Dimensions of Wildlife (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1087-1209 • E-ISSN: 1533-158X
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10871209.2013.760211
OpenAlexW2065654831
LanguageEN
References cited16

Organizational missions are thought to guide decision-making by natural resource agency officials, particularly when officials must prioritize among competing responsibilities. It is unknown, however, whether officials will rearrange their priorities in response to a fundamental change in their organizational mission. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation provided an opportunity to examine this question when it revised its mission from water development to environmentally sensitive water management with a commitment to species conservation in 1987. A comparison of all major Reclamation decisions before and after the change suggests that the new mission compelled Reclamation officials to give greater priority to the needs of endangered and threatened species than they had in previous decisions. Missions may be an important factor determining how environmental laws are implemented during agency decision-making

Agency (philosophy · Business · Endangered species · Environmental planning · Environmental protection · Environmental resource management · Geography · Habitat · Land reclamation · Natural resource · Political science · Resource (disambiguation · Sociology · Threatened species · American Environmental and Regional History · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Environmental Science · Law · Ecology

  • Studying Interpersonal Interaction

    Barbara M Montgomery, Steve Duck•Studying Interpersonal Interaction•1994

  • Mandate Design and Implementation

    Peter J May, Peter May•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1993

  • Political Control versus Bureaucratic Values

    Open Access•Kenneth J Meier, Laurence J O’toole et al.•Public Administration Review•2006

  • Drivers of natural resource-based political conflict

    Open Access•Martin Nie•Policy Sciences•2003

  • Federal Reclamation and the American West in the Twentieth Century

    Donald J Pisani•Agricultural History•2003

  • Can Cooperation Be Mandated? Implementing Intergovernmental Environmental Management in New South Wales and New Zealand

    Peter J May, Peter May•Publius The Journal of Federalism•1995

  • How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get

    Open Access•Barbara Geddes, Geddes Barbara•Political Analysis•1990

  • Politicians, Managers, and Street-Level Bureaucrats

    P J May, Stephen Winter et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2009

  • The Value of Mission Statements in Public Agencies

    Jonathan A Wei, J A Weiss et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•1999

  • The Dynamics of Political-Bureaucratic Adaptation

    B Dan Wood, Richard W Waterman•American Journal of Political…•1993

  • From Water Development to Water Management

    Open Access•Joe Bowersox•American Behavioral Scientist•2000

  • The Struggle for Water

    Charles Perrow, Wendy Nelson Espeland•Social Forces•1999

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae