Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How do YouTube videos impact tolerance of wolves

Bibliographic Data

ID15326889
AuthorsWilliam R Casola (0000-0002-5728-5399, North Carolina State University, corresponding author), Jaclyn Rushing (North Carolina State University), Sara Futch (North Carolina State University), Victoria R Vayer (North Carolina State University), Victoria Vayer (North Carolina State University), Danielle F Lawson (0000-0002-6326-2257, North Carolina State University), Michelle J Cavalieri (Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University , Raleigh, NC, USA), Lincoln R Larson (0000-0001-9591-1269, North Carolina State University), M Nils Peterson (0000-0002-4246-1206, North Carolina State University)
Year2020
Volume25
Issue6
Pages531-543
Publication date2020-06-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Dimensions of Wildlife (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1087-1209 • E-ISSN: 1533-158X
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10871209.2020.1773582
OpenAlexW3035844550
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited49

The internet serves as a dominant source of information and may shape tolerance of wildlife species. Our experimental study examined how respondents’ tolerance for wolves (i.e., attitudes, acceptance, and behavior) changed after viewing wolf related YouTube videos. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of three video treatments where wolves were framed positively, neutrally (reference), or negatively. Video treatments affected people’s tolerance of wolves: negative videos promoted declines in wolf tolerance and positive videos promoted increases in wolf tolerance. Political identification impacted change in tolerance independent of treatment. We observed an interaction between age and political identification, wherein older individuals at both ends of the political spectrum exhibited larger attitudinal responses than younger individuals, with older liberals becoming more positive and older conservatives more negative regardless of treatment. Our findings suggest the creation and dissemination of positive social media content may improve public tolerance toward controversial wildlife species like wolves

Biology · Identification (biology · Political science · Politics · The Internet · Wildlife · Animal and Plant Science Education · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology · Ecology

  • Influence of social media on fear of sharks, perceptions of intentionality associated with shark bites, and shark management preferences

    Open Access•William R Casola, Justin M Beall et al.•Frontiers in Communication•2022

  • Cultural Cognition and Ideological Framing Influence Communication About Zoonotic Disease in the Era of Covid-19

    Open Access•Justin M Beall, William R Casola et al.•Frontiers in Communication•2021

  • Interests, beliefs, experience and perceptions shape tolerance towards impacts of recovering predators

    Open Access•Keziah J Hobson, Andrew Stringer et al.•People and Nature•2024

  • Seeing wild animals just like us

    David Hanley, Drew Hanley et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2026

  • Assessing public attitudes towards sharks using the Implicit Association Test

    Open Access•Catherine Lerose, Catherine Sam Lerose et al.•Marine Policy•2026

  • Perceptions of wildlife in rehabilitation from images and statements

    Open Access•Halley D Buckanoff, Kai Williams•Frontiers in Human Dynamics•2024

  • Experiencing the wild

    Open Access•F Blake Morton, Carl D Soulsbury•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2025

  • The Impact of Social Norms on Intended Individual and Collective Civic Actions Related to Wolf Reintroduction

    Mireille N Gonzalez, Mireille Gonzalez et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2024

  • Predictors of carnivore tolerance among census-designated and self-identified rural and urban residents in Idaho, USA

    Natalie T Redmond, Kenneth Wallen•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2024

  • Wolf coverage and framing by newspapers across the Italian Eastern Alps

    Nicole Trainotti, Chiara Fedrigotti et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2023

  • Bioecological representations and social characteristics of students influence their attitudes toward wild vertebrates

    Open Access•Amanda Rozendo Da Silva, Franciany Braga-Pereira et al.•Journal of Ethnobiology and…•2023

  • Loss or gain? The role of message framing in hotel guests’ recycling behaviour

    Laura Grazzini, Padmali Rodrigo et al.•Journal of Sustainable Tourism•2018

  • “If I look at the mass I will never act”

    Open Access•Paul Slovic•Judgment and Decision Making•2007

  • Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria.

    Martin Fishbein, Icek Ajzen•Psychological Review•1974

  • Hope in the Face of Climate Change

    Maria Ojala•The Journal of Environmental…•2015

  • YouTube, Social Norms and Perceived Salience of Climate Change in the American Mind

    James T Spartz, Leona Yi-Fan Su et al.•Environmental Communication•2017

  • Selective Use of News Cues

    Open Access•Stephan Winter, Miriam J Metzger et al.•Journal of Communication•2016

  • Illegal hunting as rural defiance

    Mari Pohja-Mykrä•Routledge International Handbook…•2016

  • Effects of Message Framing and Past Experience on Intentions to Prevent Human–Coyote Conflicts

    Hang Lu, William F Siemer et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2016

  • Assessing Tolerance for Wildlife

    Jeremy T Bruskotter, Ajay Singh et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2015

  • Media Framing of Financial Mechanisms for Resolving Human–Predator Conflict in Namibia

    Open Access•Niki Rust•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2015

  • Assessing online opinions of wildlife through social media

    Mason Fidino, Seth W Herr et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2018

  • Political News in the News Feed

    Leticia Bode•Mass Communication & Society•2015

  • Polarized frames on “climate change” and “global warming” across countries and states

    Open Access•M Jones-Jang, S Mo Jang et al.•Global Environmental Change•2015

  • Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change

    Open Access•H Williams, Hywel T P Williams et al.•Global Environmental Change•2015

  • Framing and communicating climate change

    Open Access•Alexa Spence, Nick Pidgeon et al.•Global Environmental Change•2010

  • Human–Wildlife Conflicts and the Need to Include Tolerance and Coexistence

    Beatrice Frank•Society & Natural Resources•2015

  • The Symbolic Wolf

    Kristina M Slagle, Robyn S Wilson et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2018

  • Exploring the role of gain versus loss framing and point of reference in messages to reduce human–bear conflicts

    Open Access•Hang Lu, William F Siemer et al.•The Social Science Journal•2017

  • Shoot shovel and sanction yourself

    Open Access•M Nils Peterson, Emma Von Essen et al.•AMBIO•2018

  • Republicans Value Agency, Democrats Value Communion

    Open Access•Kimmo Eriksson•Social Psychology Quarterly•2018

  • Increasing attitude-behavior correspondence by broadening the scope of the behavioral measure

    Russell H Weigel, Lee S Newman•Journal of Personality and Social…•1976

  • Student and Environmental Protests in Chile

    Open Access•Andrés Scherman, Agustín Arriagada et al.•Politics•2015

  • Two spheres of domination

    Open Access•Alan Coffee, Alan M S J Coffee•Contemporary Political Theory•2015

  • Framing Theory

    D Chong, James N Druckman•Annual Review of Political Science•2007

  • Cultural cognition of scientific consensus

    Dan M Kahan, Hank C Jenkins‐smith et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2010

  • How Consumers are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information Before and After Consuming the Product

    Irwin P Levin, Gary J Gaeth•Journal of Consumer Research•1988

Unique citing works11
Citations per year2,2
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae