Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rural doctor quota students in Germany – who are they? Data on first year students from two cohorts in the federal state of Saxony

Bibliographic Data

ID15328358
AuthorsAnne-Kathrin Geier (0009-0003-4697-2809, Leipzig University, corresponding author), Ali Heuser (0000-0002-0498-7370, Leipzig University), A Heuser, Anja Heuser (Leipzig University), Markus Bleckwenn (0000-0003-1975-5369, Leipzig University), Tobias Deutsch (0000-0002-0936-6282, Leipzig University)
Year2025
Volume30
Issue1
Pages2497325-2497325
Publication date2025-05-06
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Education Online (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1087-2981 • E-ISSN: 1087-2981
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10872981.2025.2497325
PMID40329552
OpenAlexW4410179055
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited24

The lack of physicians in rural areas is a universal problem. To increase the attractiveness of rural practice for medical students, the contribution of medical schools is undisputed. However, much of the evidence on interventions before and during undergraduate education comes from countries with large areas and low population density like Australia and Canada. In Germany, selective admission to medical studies for students who agree to become rural general practitioners is still a new concept. The aim of this study was to assess the sociodemographic characteristics, attitudes and career aspirations of the rural doctor quota students from one medical school in Germany compared to their non-quota counterparts. For this cross-sectional study, a paper-based anonymous questionnaire was distributed to all first year medical students at Leipzig University in two consecutive study years.Descriptive analyses and group differences were calculated using SPSS. The response rate was 87.3% with n = 604 completed questionnaires and 40 (6.6%) students self-classified as rural doctor quota students. Quota students grew up in rural areas significantly more often than their counterparts and had more working experience in the medical field. General practice was the preferred career option for 64.1% (25/39, versus 2.7% [15/549] of non-quota students). Working self-employed in one's own medical practice was the preferred option for 71.1% (27/38) of quota students (vs. 28.0% [153/546] of non-quota students). Quota students valued a broad spectrum of patients, a long-term doctor-patient relationship, employee management and prestige more highly than their fellow students. Students from the rural doctor quota largely exhibit characteristics and attitudes that are compatible with future rural practice, despite showing little differences in sociodemographic items such as age and marital status. Not all students agree with the program objective. To demonstrate an impact on the health services, longitudinal data is necessary to monitor career choices over time

Attractiveness · Cross-sectional study · Environmental health · Family medicine · Medical education · Population · Psychological intervention · Rural area · Diversity and Career in Medicine · Global Health Workforce Issues · Medical Education and Admissions · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology

  • Rural admission quota in Germany

    Open Access•Maike Krauthausen, Lisa Wingender et al.•BMC Medical Education•2026

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae