Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A corpus-based search for machine translationese in terms of discourse coherence

Bibliographic Data

ID15451453
AuthorsYue Jiang (0000-0002-0310-2657, Xi'an Jiaotong University, corresponding author), Jiang Niu (0000-0003-4980-1936, Xi'an Jiaotong University, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume23
Issue2
Pages148-166
Publication date2022-11-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAcross Languages and Cultures (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1585-1923 • E-ISSN: 1588-2519
PublisherAkadémiai Kiadó (PUBLISHER • HU)
DOI10.1556/084.2022.00182
OpenAlexW4308434555
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited32

Earlier studies have corroborated that human translation exhibits unique linguistic features, usually referred to as translationese. However, research on machine translationese, in spite of some sparse efforts, is still in its infancy. By comparing machine translation with human translation and original target language texts, this study aims to investigate if machine translation has unique linguistic features of its own too, to what extent machine translations are different from human translations and target-language originals, and what characteristics are typical of machine translations. To this end, we collected a corpus containing English translations of modern Chinese literary texts produced by neural machine translation systems and human professional translators and comparable original texts in the target language. Based on the corpus, a quantitative study of discourse coherence was conducted by observing metrics in three dimensions borrowed from Coh-Metrix, including connectives, latent semantic analysis and the situation/mental model. The results support the existence of translationese in both human and machine translations when they are compared with original texts. However, machine translationese is not the same as human translationese in some metrics of discourse coherence. Additionally, machine translation systems, such as Google and DeepL, when compared with each other, show unique features in some coherence metrics, although on the whole they are not significantly different from each other in those coherence metrics

Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy · Evaluation of machine translation · Example-based machine translation · Human–machine system · Linguistics · Machine translation · Machine translation software usability · Natural language processing · Computer Science · Mathematics · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Text Readability and Simplification · Topic Modeling · Artificial Intelligence

  • Machine‐Translated Language as a Distinctive Translational Variety

    Open Access•Jiang Niu, Yue Jiang et al.•International Journal of Applied…•2026

  • What are the differences? A comparative study of generative artificial intelligence translation and human translation of scientific texts

    Open Access•Linling Fu, Lei Liu•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Variability of cohesion and coherence in Chinese-to-English translation

    Open Access•Jia Li, Yuan Gao•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • Does simplification hold true for machine translations? A corpus-based analysis of lexical diversity in text varieties across genres

    Open Access•Jiang Niu, Yue Jiang•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Does simplification hypothesis still hold true for LLM-translated legal texts? A mixed-effects model approach

    Open Access•Jiajun Qian, Lei Li et al.•Perspectives•2026

  • Multidimensional comparison of Chinese-English interpreting outputs from human and machine

    Open Access•Yiguang Liu, Junying Liang•Linguistics and Education•2024

  • Exploring AI’s performance in literary autobiography translation

    Open Access•Yingqi Huang, Andrew Kay Fan Cheung•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2026

  • Is human translation more conservative than machine translation

    Open Access•Jia Li, Xianyao Hu•International Journal of Corpus…•2025

  • Distinguishing ChatGPT‐Generated Translation From Neural Machine Translation and Human Translation

    Open Access•Zhaokun Jiang, Qianxi Lv et al.•International Journal of Applied…•2026

  • Too Much of One Thing, Too Little of Another? Comparing Cohesive Networks Between Humans and ChatGPT in Academic Writings and Translations

    Open Access•Jia Li•International Journal of Applied…•2026

  • A better or worse communicator? Comparing human and machine translation in source language shining through across registers

    Open Access•Jia Li, Xianyao Hu•Lingua•2024

  • Enhancing accuracy and acceptability of English-Chinese generative AI translation in clinical guidelines

    Shengdong Guo, Zhijie Wu•Across Languages and Cultures•2026

  • Who's afraid of AI-powered translation

    Jing Li, Jia Li et al.•Across Languages and Cultures•2026

  • Addressing MT literacy in a specialized translation class

    Open Access•A Peterlin, Tamara Mikolič Južnič•Across Languages and Cultures•2026

  • Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix

    Open Access•D S Mcnamara, Arthur C Graesser et al.•Automated Evaluation of Text and…•2014

  • Coh-Metrix

    Open Access•Arthur C Graesser, D S Mcnamara et al.•Behavior Research Methods,…•2004

  • Corpus Linguistics and Translation Studies — Implications and Applications

    Mona Baker•Text and Technology•1993

  • An intermodal approach to cohesion in constrained and unconstrained language

    Open Access•Marta Kajzer-Wietrzny•Target International Journal of…•2022

  • Reporting That in Translated English. Evidence for Subconscious Processes of Explicitation

    Maeve Olohan, Mona Baker•Across Languages and Cultures•2000

  • That Again

    Haidee Kruger•Across Languages and Cultures•2018

  • Explicitation in Neural Machine Translation

    Ralph Krüger•Across Languages and Cultures•2020

  • An analytic and cognitive parameterization of coherence relations

    Open Access•Max Louwerse•Cognitive Linguistics•2002

  • Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English

    Open Access•Günter Rohdenburg•Cognitive Linguistics•1996

  • Resistance and accommodation

    Patrick Cadwell, O''Brien et al.•Perspectives•2017

  • Under pressure

    Joss Moorkens•Perspectives•2017

  • The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis

    Peter W Foltz, Walter Kintsch et al.•Discourse Processes•1998

  • Introduction to WordNet

    George A Miller, Richard Beckwith et al.•International Journal of…•1990

  • Situation models in language comprehension and memory

    Rolf A Zwaan, Gabriel A Radvansky•Psychological Bulletin•1998

  • In Search of the Third Code

    Open Access•Linn Øverås•Meta Journal des traducteurs•2002

Unique citing works14
Citations per year7
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae