Less-PHARMA Study
Identifying and Deprescribing Potentially Inappropriate Medication in the Elderly Population with Excessive Polypharmacy in Primary Care
Bibliographic Data
Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) increases adverse drug reactions and mortality, especially in excessively polymedicated patients. General practitioners are often in charge of this process. Some tools have been created to support them in this matter. This study aimed to measure the amount of potentially inappropriate medication among excessively polymedicated patients using several supporting tools and assess the feasibility of these tools in primary care. Several explicit deprescribing criteria were used to identify potentially inappropriate medications. The level of agreement between all the criteria and the acceptance by the general practitioner (GP) was also measured. We analysed whether the drugs proposed for deprescribing were eventually withdrawn after twelve months. The total number of drugs prescribed was 2038. Six hundred and forty-nine drugs (31.8%) were considered potentially inappropriate by at least one of the tools. GPs agreed with the tools in 56.7% of the cases. In a 12-month period, 109 drugs, representing 29.6% of the drugs that GPs agreed to deprescribe, were withdrawn. Elderly excessively polymedicated patients accumulated a great number of PIMs. The use of deprescribing supporting tools, such as explicit criteria, is feasible in primary care, and these tools are well accepted by the GPs. However, eventual withdrawal was carried out in less than half of the cases
Beers Criteria · Deprescribing · Elderly people · Family medicine · Geriatrics · Intensive care medicine · Medical emergency · Polypharmacy · Primary care · Psychiatry · Medication Adherence and Compliance · Medicine · Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes · Pharmaceutical studies and practices · Gerontology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|