Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An Electromyographic Analysis of Lateral Raise Variations and Frontal Raise in Competitive Bodybuilders

Bibliographic Data

ID15464787
AuthorsGiuseppe Coratella (0000-0001-7523-9102, University of Milan, corresponding author), Gianpaolo Tornatore (0000-0002-0187-8371, University of Milan), S Longo (0000-0001-5806-8305, University of Milan), Fabio Esposito (0000-0002-4420-2611, University of Milan), Emiliano Cè (0000-0003-0691-3153, University of Milan)
Year2020
Volume17
Issue17
Pages6015-6015
Publication date2020-08-19
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph17176015
PMID32824894
OpenAlexW3050829001
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited27

The present study examined the muscle activation in lateral raise with humerus rotated externally (LR-external), neutrally (LR-neutral), internally (LR-internal), with flexed elbow (LR-flexed) and frontal raise during both the concentric and eccentric phase. Ten competitive bodybuilders performed the exercises. Normalized surface electromyographic root mean square (sEMG RMS) was obtained from anterior , medial , and posterior deltoid , pectoralis major , upper trapezius , and triceps brachii . During the concentric phase, anterior deltoid and posterior deltoid showed greater sEMG RMS in frontal raise (effect size (ES)-range: 1.78/9.25)) and LR-internal (ES-range: 10.79/21.34), respectively, vs. all other exercises. Medial deltoid showed greater sEMG RMS in LR-neutral than LR-external (ES: 1.47 (95% confidence-interval-CI: 0.43/2.38)), frontal raise (ES: 10.28(95% CI: 6.67/13.01)), and LR-flexed (ES: 6.41(95% CI: 4.04/8.23)). Pectoralis major showed greater sEMG RMS in frontal raise vs. all other exercises (ES-range: 17.2/29.5), while upper trapezius (ES-range: 2.66/7.18) and triceps brachii (ES-range: 0.41/3.31) showed greater sEMG RMS in LR-internal vs. all other exercises. Similar recruitment patterns were found during the eccentric phase. When humerus rotates internally, greater activation of posterior deltoid , triceps brachii , and upper trapezius occurs. Humerus external rotation increases the activation of anterior and medial deltoid. Frontal raise mainly activates anterior deltoid and pectoralis major . LR variations and frontal raise activate specifically shoulders muscles and should be proposed accordingly

Biceps · Concentric · Coronal plane · Deltoid curve · Eccentric · Geometry · Humerus · Shoulders · Mathematics · Medicine · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Performance and Training · Anatomy · Surgery

  • An Electromyographic Analysis of Romanian, Step-Romanian, and Stiff-Leg Deadlift

    Open Access•Giuseppe Coratella, Gianpaolo Tornatore et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Progressive Statistics for Studies in Sports Medicine and Exercise Science

    William G Hopkins, Will G Hopkins et al.•Medicine & Science in Sports &…•2009

  • Development of recommendations for Semg sensors and sensor placement procedures

    Open Access•Hermie J Hermens, Hermie Hermens et al.•Journal of Electromyography and…•2000

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,25
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae