Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Effects of Capacitive-Resistive Electric Transfer on Sports Performance in Paralympic Swimmers

A Stopped Randomized Clinical Trial

Bibliographic Data

ID15466288
AuthorsLuis De Sousa-De Sousa (0000-0002-5986-8432, Universidad Complutense de Madrid), Hugo G Espinosa (0000-0002-3974-6462, Griffith University), José Luis Maté‐Muñoz (0000-0003-3282-1455, Universidad Complutense de Madrid), María Del Carmen Lozano-Estevan (0000-0001-7843-5432, Universidad Complutense de Madrid), Sara Cerrolaza-Tudanca (Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio), Manuel Rozalén-Bustín (0000-0002-5060-799X, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio), Samuel Fernández‐Carnero (0000-0003-2893-1627, Universidad de Alcalá, corresponding author), Pablo García-Fernández (0000-0002-6604-9136, Universidad Complutense de Madrid)
Year2022
Volume19
Issue21
Pages14620-14620
Publication date2022-11-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph192114620
PMID36361500
OpenAlexW4308579673
LanguageEN
References cited55

Throughout history a variety of therapeutic tools have been studied as possible enhancers of sports activities. This study proposes the use of Capacitive-Resistive Electric Transfer (CRET) as a performance booster to paralympic athletes, specifically those belonging to the Spanish Paralympic swimming committee. The study was a randomized, single-blind, and observer-blind, crossover clinical trial. Six athletes were randomly assigned to three groups: one treated with CRET (A); a placebo group (B) and a control group (C). The CRET group attended a twenty-minute session before being subjected to pool trials at distances of 50 and 100 m at maximum performance. Measurements were in two dimensions: time in seconds and the Borg scale for perceived exertion. Comparisons between groups were made with respect to distance and the main variables. In the case of perceived exertion, no significant changes were observed in any of the distances; however, in the case of the time variable, a significant difference was observed between Group A vs. Personal Record at 100 m distance (76.3 ± 6.8 vs. 68.4 ± 3.3). The proposed protocol and level of hyperthermia applied suggest refusal of CRET use for the 100-m distance a few minutes before sports practice. Our analysis suggests the need to modify the presented protocol. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier under NCT number: NCT04336007

Athletes · Blood pressure · Crossover study · Heart rate · Perceived exertion · Physical medicine and rehabilitation · Physical therapy · Placebo · Randomized controlled trial · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise · Medicine · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Psychology · Internal Medicine · Surgery

  • Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion

    Gunnar Borg, GUNNAR A V BORG•Medicine & Science in Sports &…•1982

  • The Intensity of Motivation

    Jack W Brehm, Elizabeth A Self•Annual Review of Psychology•1989

  • Non-parametric statistics for psychological research

    Lincoln E Moses•Psychological Bulletin•1952

  • A power primer

    Jacob Cohen•Psychological Bulletin•1992

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae