Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Compliance with Barrier Gestures during Covid-19 Pandemic as a Function of the Context

A Longitudinal Observational Survey at the University of Liège

Bibliographic Data

ID15466685
AuthorsGianni Parisi (0000-0003-1388-4004, University of Liège), Véronique Renault (0000-0003-2529-3965, University of Liège), Marie‐France Humblet (0000-0003-4069-9402, University of Liège), Marie-France Humblet (University of Liège), Nicolas Ochelen (University of Liège), Anh Nguyet Diep (0000-0001-5134-3220, University of Liège), Michèle Guillaume (0000-0001-9258-7002, University of Liège), Anne-Françoise Donneau (Biostatistics Unit, Liège University, 4000 Liège, Belgium), Anne‐Françoise Donneau (0000-0002-5385-6289, University of Liège), Fabrice Bureau (0000-0002-5501-0949, University of Liège), Laurent Gillet (0000-0002-1047-2525, University of Liège), Anne-Catherine Lange (0000-0002-8220-4634, University of Liège), Fabienne Michel (0000-0003-3105-6747, University of Liège), Sébastien Fontaine (0000-0002-0324-5279, University of Liège), Claude Saegerman (0000-0001-9087-7436, University of Liège, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume19
Issue18
Pages11523-11523
Publication date2022-09-13
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph191811523
PMID36141805
OpenAlexW4296002933
LanguageEN
References cited31

During the COVID-19 pandemic, barrier gestures such as mask wearing, physical distancing, greetings without contact, one-way circulation flow, and hand sanitization were major strategies to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2, but they were only useful if consistently applied. This survey was a follow-up of the first survey performed in 2020 at the University of Liège. We aim to evaluate the compliance with these gestures on campuses and examine differences in the extent of the compliance observed in different educational activities and contexts. During 3.5 months, the counting of compliant and non-compliant behaviors was performed each week in randomly selected rooms. Using data collected during both surveys (2020 and 2021), binomial negative regression models of compliance depending on periods (teaching periods and exam sessions), type of rooms, and campuses were conducted to evaluate prevalence ratios of compliance. The percentage of compliance in this second survey was the highest for mask wearing and physical distancing during educational activities (90% and 88%, respectively) and lowest for physical distancing outside educational activities and hand sanitization (45% and 52%, respectively). Multivariate analyses revealed that the compliance with most gestures was significantly higher in teaching rooms than in hallways and restaurants and during exam sessions. The compliance with physical distancing was significantly higher (from 66%) in auditoriums, where students had to remain seated, than during practical works that allowed or required free movement. Therefore, the compliance with barrier gestures was associated with contextual settings, which should be considered when communicating and managing barrier gestures. Further studies should specify and confirm the determining contextual characteristics regarding the compliance with barrier gestures in times of pandemic

Compliance (psychology · Context (archaeology · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Distancing · Geography · Gesture · Observational study · Pandemic · Social distance · Computer Science · COVID-19 and Mental Health · Infection Control and Ventilation · Medicine · Psychology · Retinal and Optic Conditions · Social Psychology

  • Applied Logistic Regression

    Open Access•David W Hosmer, David W Jr Hosmer et al.•Applied Logistic Regression•2013

  • Who is wearing a mask? Gender-, age-, and location-related differences during the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Michael H Haischer, Rachel Beilfuss et al.•PLoS ONE•2020

  • Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against Sars-CoV-2

    Open Access•Merryn Voysey, Sue Ann Costa Clemens et al.•The Lancet•2021

  • Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine

    Open Access•Fernando P Polack, Stephen J Thomas et al.•New England Journal of Medicine•2020

  • A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin

    Open Access•Peng Zhou, Xing-Lou Yang et al.•Nature•2020

  • Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology

    Viswanath Venkatesh, Venkatesh Venkatesh et al.•MIS Quarterly•2012

  • Social pressure, altruism, free-riding, and non-compliance in mask wearing by U.S. residents in response to Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Courtney Bir, Nicole Olynk Widmar•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2021

  • The First Random Observational Survey of Barrier Gestures against Covid-19

    Open Access•Véronique Renault, Marie‐France Humblet et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Students’ Views towards Sars-Cov-2 Mass Asymptomatic Testing, Social Distancing and Self-Isolation in a University Setting during the Covid-19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Harry Blake, Holly Knight et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Knowledge, socio-cognitive perceptions and the practice of hand hygiene and social distancing during the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Christine Barrett, Kei Long Cheung•BMC Public Health•2021

  • Policing Covid-19 physical distancing measures

    Molly M McCarthy, Kristina Murphy et al.•Policing & Society•2021

  • It depends on how you ask

    Open Access•Shane Timmon, Frances Mcginnity et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2021

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae