Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Improving Well-Being of Farmers Using Ecological Awareness around Protected Areas

Evidence from Qinling Region, China

Bibliographic Data

ID15467645
AuthorsLi Ma (0000-0002-8688-5588, Beijing Forestry University), Yueting Qin (Beijing Forestry University), Han Zhang (0000-0002-5265-7659, Beijing Forestry University), Jie Zheng (0009-0002-7853-6721, Beijing Forestry University), Yilei Hou (Beijing Forestry University, corresponding author), Yali Wen (Beijing Forestry University, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume18
Issue18
Pages9792-9792
Publication date2021-09-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph18189792
PMID34574717
OpenAlexW3200146770
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited36

Sustainability of ecosystems is crucial for improving human well-being and sustainably developing human society. In recent years, global attention towards ecosystems and human well-being has been increasing. Exploring and understanding the relationship between ecosystems and human well-being, and establishing the well-being of residents while protecting the ecosystem have become urgent problems. Based on 618 valid samples collected from communities surrounding seven nature reserves in the Qinling Mountains region of China, this study analyzed the impact of ecosystem services on farmers' well-being from the perspective of their subjective perception of ecosystem services by using multiple linear regression and seemingly unrelated regression methods. The main conclusions are as follows: supply of vegetation and clean water improves farmers' well-being, improvement of air quality increases farmers' life satisfaction, and the sense of belonging and tourism value brought by the ecosystem are important factors for farmers' physical and mental pleasure and economic benefits. Therefore, the following countermeasures and suggestions are proposed: focusing on establishing the ecological well-being of farmers, improve implementation of the services and benefits provided by the ecosystem to farmers, increase publicity and education to improve the protection consciousness of farmers, and improve community participation mechanisms while mobilizing enthusiasm for protection. This article starts from the perspective of farmers' perception, attempting to explore whether changes in ecosystem service functions will affect farmers' well-being, so as to provide new opinions and suggestions for improving farmers' well-being

Business · Economics · Ecosystem · Ecosystem services · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Pleasure · Political science · Publicity · Sustainability · Well-being · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Psychology · Urban Agriculture and Sustainability · Urban Green Space and Health · Ecology · Marketing

  • Climate Resilience and Land Governance

    Open Access•Benedetta Coluccia, Donatella Porrini et al.•Business Strategy and the…•2026

  • How does rural tourism affect farmers' subjective well-being? The mediating role of farmers' livelihoods

    Open Access•Xiuzhi Lin, Qifu Lai•Acta Psychologica•2025

  • Resident Willingness to Pay for Ecosystem Services in Hillside Forests

    Open Access•Wan-Jiun Chen, Jihn-Fa Jan et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Effect of Rural Human Settlement Environment around Nature Reserves on Farmers’ Well-Being

    Open Access•Tingting Zhang, Dan He et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Quality of life of organic and conventional soybean farmers

    Open Access•Jefferson Andronio Ramundo Staduto, Ana Cecília Kreter et al.•Ambiente & sociedade•2024

  • Twenty years of ecosystem services

    Open Access•Alexey Voinov, R S De Groot et al.•Ecosystem Services•2017

  • The OECD Better Life Initiative

    Open Access•Martine Durand•Review of Income and Wealth•2015

  • Getting the measure of ecosystem services

    Open Access•Belinda Reyers, Reinette Biggs et al.•Frontiers in Ecology and the…•2013

  • Relating ecoystem services to domains of human well-being

    Open Access•Lisa M Smith, Jason L Case et al.•Ecological Indicators•2013

  • Humans and Nature

    Open Access•Roly Russell, Anne D Guerry et al.•Annual Review of Environment and…•2013

  • The role of human, social, built, and natural capital in explaining life satisfaction at the country level

    Open Access•Amanda W Vemuri, R Costanza•Ecological Economics•2006

  • Rancher Preferences for a Payment for Ecosystem Services Program in Southwestern Wyoming

    Open Access•Kristiana Hansen, Esther Duke et al.•Ecological Economics•2018

  • Invasive Species Impacts on Human Well-being Using the Life Satisfaction Index

    Open Access•Benjamin A Jones•Ecological Economics•2017

  • The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital

    Open Access•R Costanza, Ralph C D’arge et al.•Ecological Economics•1998

  • Farmer perceptions of wetlands and waterbodies

    Open Access•Simon Greenland‐Smith, Simon Greenland-Smith et al.•Ecological Economics•2016

  • A Review of the Elements of Human Well-Being with an Emphasis on the Contribution of Ecosystem Services

    Open Access•James K Summers, Lisa M Smith et al.•AMBIO•2012

  • Socioeconomic and ecological direct and spillover effects of China's giant panda nature reserves

    Open Access•Ben Ma, Yuqian Zhang et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2020

  • Forest ecosystem services derived by smallholder farmers in northwestern Madagascar

    Open Access•Radhika Dave, Emma L Tompkins et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2016

  • Protected areas, household environmental incomes and well-being in the Greater Serengeti-Mara Ecosystem

    Open Access•Xi Jiao, Solomon Zena Walelign et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2019

  • Farmers consideration of soil ecosystem services in agricultural management - A case study from Saxony, Germany

    Open Access•Victoria Dietze, Nina Hagemann et al.•Land Use Policy•2019

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1,25
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae