Is There a Dose–Response Relationship between High-Intensity Interval Exercise (Hiie) Intensity and Affective Valence? Analysis of Three Hiie Sessions Performed with Different Amplitudes

Bibliographic Data

ID15467927
AuthorsMichel O Silva (0000-0001-8651-8676, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro), Tony Meireles Santos (0000-0002-5242-0117, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco), Allan Inoue (0000-0003-3068-0839, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro), Lucas Eduardo Rodrigues Santos (0000-0001-5546-1398, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco), Weydyson de Lima do Nascimento Anastácio (0000-0001-9529-5670, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco), Eduardo Lattari (0000-0003-0600-4005, Universidade Salgado de Oliveira), Bruno Ribeiro Ramalho Oliveira (0000-0001-7712-0025, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume20
Issue3
Pages2698-2698
Publication date2023-02-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph20032698
PMID36768063
OpenAlexW4319159545
LanguageEN
References cited28

The inverse relationship between exercise intensity and affective valence is well established for continuous exercise but not for high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE). The objective was to verify the dose-response relationship between exercise intensity and affective valence in HIIE sessions. Eleven young men underwent a vigorous-intensity continuous exercise (VICE) and three HIIE sessions at the same average intensity (70% of peak power-W Peak ) and duration (20 min) but with different amplitudes: 10 × [1 min at 90% W Peak /1 min at 50% W Peak ]-HIIE-90/50; 10 × [1 min at 100% W Peak /1 min at 40% W Peak ]-HIIE-100/40; 10 × [1 min at 110% W Peak /1 min at 30% W Peak ]-HIIE-110/30. During the exercise sessions, psychophysiological variables were recorded (VO 2 , VCO 2 , heart rate, perceived exertion CR10, and Feeling Scale (FS)). Higher correlations were found between CR10 and FS for all conditions (VICE = -0.987; HIIE-90/50 = -0.873; HIIE-100/40 = -0.908; HIIE-110/30 = -0.948). Regarding the physiological variables, the %HR Max presented moderate inverse correlations with FS for all exercise conditions (VICE = -0.867; HIIE-90/50 = -0.818; HIIE-100/40 = -0.837; HIIE-110/30 = -0.828) while the respiratory variables (%VO 2Peak and %VCO 2Peak ) presented low-to-moderate correlations only for VICE, HIIE-90/50, and HIIE-100/40 (ranging from -0.523 to -0.805). Poor correlations were observed between the %VO 2Peak (r = -0.293) and %VCO 2Peak (r = -0.020) with FS. The results indicated that perceived exertion is more sensible than physiological variables to explain the intensity-affective valence relationship in HIIE sessions. RPE should be used for HIIE prescription with a focus on affect

Amplitude · Audiology · Intensity (physics · Physics · Quantum mechanics · Valence (chemistry · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology · Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control · Medicine · Psychology · Sports Performance and Training

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access