Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Vicarious Traumatization Questionnaire

Psychometric Properties Using Rasch Model and Structural Equation Modeling

Bibliographic Data

ID15469186
AuthorsMohd Noor Norhayati (0000-0002-6372-1476, Universiti Sains Malaysia), Samah Ali Mohsen Mofreh (0000-0002-7980-2940, Universiti Sains Malaysia, corresponding author), Yacob Mohd Azman (Hospital Raja Perempuan Zainab II)
Year2021
Volume18
Issue9
Pages4949-4949
Publication date2021-05-06
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph18094949
PMID34066534
OpenAlexW3158722246
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited4

Frontline healthcare providers are exposed to indirect trauma through dealing with traumatized patients. This puts them at risk of vicarious traumatization. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, this study seeks to establish the psychometric properties of the Malay version of the Vicarious Traumatization Questionnaire among healthcare providers. A cross-sectional study was conducted. The translated Malay version of the Vicarious Traumatization Questionnaire was completed by 352 healthcare providers in Kelantan, Malaysia. The data was entered using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA, 2019), and descriptive analysis was performed. The psychometric properties of the scale were assessed in two phases. The Rasch model to assess the validity and reliability was performed using Winsteps version 3.72.3. The confirmatory factor analysis using the structural equation modeling was performed using AMOS version 23.0. The Rasch analysis showed that the 38 items, in two constructs, had high item reliability and item separation at 0.97 and item separation at 5.36, respectively, while good person reliability and person separation were at 0.95 and 4.58, respectively. The correlations of all persons and items are greater than 0.20. There are no misfitting or overfitting items in the outfit MNSQ. There are four items that are challenging in answering the scale. The final model of the confirmatory factor analysis shows two constructs with 38 items demonstrating acceptable factor loadings, domain to domain correlation, and best fit (Chi-squared/degree of freedom = 4.73; Tucker-Lewis index = 0.94; comparative fit index = 0.94; and root mean square error of approximation = 0.10). Composite reliability and average variance extracted of the domains were higher than 0.7 and 0.5, respectively. The Vicarious Traumatization Questionnaire tested among healthcare providers has been shown to valid and reliable to assess vicarious traumatization

Confirmatory factor analysis · Construct validity · Descriptive statistics · Developmental psychology · Malay · Psychometrics · Rasch model · Reliability (semiconductor · Scale (ratio · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Clinical Psychology · COVID-19 and Mental Health · Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout · Mathematics · Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research · Psychology

  • How to improve users' purchase intention of agricultural products through live streaming systems

    Open Access•Chao Gu, Xin Sun et al.•Acta Psychologica•2025

  • Rasch analysis of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale among Chinese patients with major depressive disorder

    Open Access•Jingxiao Kuang, Jing Zhong et al.•Acta Psychologica•2025

  • The mental health of medical workers in Wuhan, China dealing with the 2019 novel coronavirus

    Open Access•Lijun Kang, Yi Li et al.•The Lancet Psychiatry•2020

  • Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures

    Open Access•Diane Wild, Alyson Grove et al.•Value in Health•2005

  • Vicarious traumatization in the general public, members, and non-members of medical teams aiding in Covid-19 control

    Open Access•Zhenyu Li, Jingwu Ge et al.•Brain, Behavior, and Immunity•2020

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae