Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice

Dados Bibliográficos

ID15503696
AutoresSeán Paul Teeling (0000-0002-4102-7280, University College Dublin, autor correspondente), Carmel Davies (0009-0006-4324-4007, University College Dublin), Marlize Barnard (0000-0002-5125-8648, University College Dublin), Laserina O’Connor (0000-0003-3020-9246, University College Dublin), Alice Coffey (0000-0003-1059-4685, University of Limerick), Valerie Lambert (0000-0003-4396-5462, Dublin City University), Veronica Lambert (School of Nursing, Psychotherapy and Community Health, Dublin City University (DCU), 620 Collins Avenue Extension, Whitehall, D09 X984 Dublin 9, Ireland), Martin Mcnamara (0000-0003-0275-0852, University College Dublin), Dympna Tuohy (0000-0001-6240-0315, University of Limerick), Tim Frawley (0000-0002-2108-005X, University College Dublin), Catherine Redmond (University College Dublin), Suja Somanadhan (0000-0002-0590-0126, University College Dublin), Mary Casey (0000-0003-3305-0074, University College Dublin), Yvonne Corcoran (0000-0001-9941-1042, Dublin City University), Owen Doody (0000-0002-3708-1647, University of Limerick), Denise O’brien (0000-0003-1434-4069, University College Dublin), Maria Noonan (0000-0003-2313-9964, University of Limerick), Rita Smith (0000-0002-9090-9642, University College Dublin), C Bradshaw (0000-0003-1272-3823, University of Limerick), Sylvia Murphy Tighe (0000-0001-8439-2184, Department of Nursing and Midwifery, North Bank Campus, University of Limerick (UL), Health Science Building, UL, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland), Sylvia Murphy (University of Limerick), Liz Dore (0000-0002-6762-1114, University of Limerick), Rosemary Lyons (University of Limerick), Máire McGeehan (0000-0002-4468-7727, University of Limerick), Anne Gallen (HSE Nursing & Midwifery Planning & Development, Dublin Mid Leinster, Mill Lane, Palmerstown, D20 HY57 Dublin, Ireland)
Ano2021
Volume18
Fascículo22
Páginas11932-11932
Data de publicação2021-11-13
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
EditoraMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph182211932
PMID34831694
OpenAlexW3211435755
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas87

Quality measurement initiatives promote quality improvement in healthcare but can be challenging to implement effectively. This paper presents a Rapid Realist Review (RRR) of published literature on Quality Care-Process Metrics (QCP-M) implementation in nursing and midwifery practice. An RRR informed by RAMESES II standards was conducted as an efficient means to synthesize evidence using an expert panel. The review involved research question development, quality appraisal, data extraction, and evidence synthesis. Six program theories summarised below identify the key characteristics that promote positive outcomes in QCP-M implementation. Program Theory 1: Focuses on the evidence base and accessibility of the QCP-M and their ease of use by nurses and midwives working in busy and complex care environments. Program Theory 2: Examines the influence of external factors on QCP-M implementation. Program Theory 3: Relates to existing cultures and systems within clinical sites. Program Theory 4: Relates to nurses' and midwives' knowledge and beliefs. Program Theory 5: Builds on the staff theme of Programme Theory four, extending the culture of organizational learning, and highlights the meaningful engagement of nurses and midwives in the implementation process as a key characteristic of success. Program Theory 6: Relates to patient needs. The results provide nursing and midwifery policymakers and professionals with evidence-based program theory that can be translated into action-orientated strategies to help guide successful QCP-M implementation

Alternative medicine · Critical appraisal · Epistemology · Health care · MEDLINE · Nursing process · Nursing theory · Operations management · Political science · Process (computing · Quality (philosophy · Quality management · Computer Science · Engineering · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Health Policy Implementation Science · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology

  • Developing New Methods for Person-Centred Approaches to Adjudicate Context–Mechanism–Outcome Configurations in Realist Evaluation

    Open Access•Seán Paul Teeling, Jan Dewing et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Implementation, context and complexity

    Open Access•C May, Mark Johnson et al.•Implementation Science•2016

  • Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions

    Open Access•Ray Pawson, Trisha Greenhalgh et al.•Journal of Health Services…•2005

  • Making sense of complexity in context and implementation

    Open Access•Lisa M Pfadenhauer, Ansgar Gerhardus et al.•Implementation Science•2017

  • A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

    Open Access•M Alexis Kirk, Caitlin Kelley et al.•Implementation Science•2015

  • Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice

    Arthur Kitson, Gill Harvey et al.•BMJ Quality & Safety•1998

  • A Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) for Integrating Research Findings into Practice

    Open Access•Adrianne C Feldstein, Russell E Glasgow•The Joint Commission Journal on…•2008

  • Development of a framework for person‐centred nursing

    Open Access•Brendan Mccormack, Tanya McCance et al.•Journal of Advanced Nursing•2006

  • Context matters in implementation science

    Open Access•Phoebe Nilsen, Per Nilsen et al.•BMC Health Services Research•2019

  • The dynamic sustainability framework

    Open Access•David Chambers, David A Chambers et al.•Implementation Science•2013

  • Towards a general theory of implementation

    Open Access•C May•Implementation Science•2013

  • Rameses II reporting standards for realist evaluations

    Open Access•Geoff Wong, Gill Westhorp et al.•BMC Medicine•2016

  • Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice

    Open Access•Laura J Damschroder, David C Aron et al.•Implementation Science•2009

  • Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations

    Open Access•Trisha Greenhalgh, Glenn Robert et al.•Milbank Quarterly•2004

  • Care Planning

    Open Access•Sarah Brown, Monique Lhussier et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2018

  • Using Realistic Evaluation to Evaluate a Practice-level Intervention to Improve Primary Healthcare for Patients with Long-term Mental Illness

    Open Access•Richard Byng, Ian Norman et al.•Evaluation•2005

  • Middle-range realism

    Open Access•Ray Pawson•European Journal of Sociology•2000

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano0,25
Intervalo de citações2022 - 2022 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae