Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Implying implausibility and undermining versus accepting peoples’ experiences of suicidal ideation and self-harm in Emergency Department psychosocial assessments

Datos Bibliográficos

ID15519654
AutoresClara Bergen (0000-0002-6278-7668, City, University of London, autor de correspondencia), Lisa Bortolotti (0000-0003-0507-4650, University of Birmingham), Rachel Temple (0000-0002-3126-5701, McPin Foundation), Rachel Kimberley Temple, Catherine Fadashe (McPin Foundation), Carmen Lee (0000-0003-2609-2591, University of Exeter), Michele C Lim (0000-0001-8069-0416, University College London), Michele Lim, Rose Mccabe (0000-0003-2041-7383, City, University of London, autor de correspondencia)
Año2023
Volumen14
Páginas1197512-1197512
Fecha de publicación2023-08-30
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaFrontiers in Psychiatry (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1664-0640 • E-ISSN: 1664-0640
EditorialFrontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1197512
PMID37711424
OpenAlexW4386309639
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas49

These findings advance our understanding of how peoples' experiences of suicidality or self-harm are undermined or accepted in mental health encounters in the ED. They have important clinical implications: patients report that when their experiences are not accepted or undermined, this makes them more distressed, less hopeful about the future and discourages future help-seeking when in crisis. Conversely, acknowledging, accepting and validating suicidality/self-harm and introducing a new ways of understanding peoples' experiences may make people less suicidal and more hopeful, generates shared understanding and encourages future help-seeking

Biopsychosocial model · CONTEST · Conversation · Coping (psychology · Emergency department · Harm · Medical emergency · Poison control · Political science · Psychiatry · Psychosocial · Suicidal ideation · Suicide prevention · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Medicine · Psychology · Racial and Ethnic Identity Research · Social Psychology

  • Recognizing epistemic injustice in healthcare

    Open Access•Sabine Færge, Lea Muldtofte et al.•Medicine Health Care and Philosophy•2026

  • Scaling injustice

    Open Access•Oluwafunmilayo Akinlade•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2026

  • Conversation Analysis and Other‐Initiated Repair

    Open Access•Trevor Benjamin, Harrie Mazeland•Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics•2026

  • The News Interview

    Open Access•E Clayman, Steven Clayman et al.•News Interview•2002

  • Territories of knowledge, territories of experience

    Open Access•J Heritage•Morality of Knowledge in…•2011

  • Prevalence of non-suicidal self-harm and service contact in England, 2000–14

    Open Access•Shea Mcmanu, Sally McManus et al.•The Lancet Psychiatry•2019

  • Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments

    Open Access•A Pomerantz•Structures of Social Action•1985

  • The Structure of Patients' Presenting Concerns

    J Heritage, Jeffrey D Robinson•Health Communication•2006

  • The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation

    Open Access•Tanya Stivers, L Mondada et al.•Morality of Knowledge in…•2011

  • Communication in youth mental health clinical encounters

    Open Access•Clara Bergen, Lisa Bortolotti et al.•Theory & Psychology•2022

  • Gatekeeping and factors underlying decisions not to refer to mental health services after self-harm

    Open Access•Clara Bergen, Matthew Lomas et al.•SSM - Qualitative Research in…•2023

  • Epistemic injustice in healthcare

    Open Access•Havi Carel, Ian James Kidd•Medicine Health Care and Philosophy•2014

  • Police interviews with child witnesses

    Guusje Jol, Guusje Annie Hubertine Jol et al.•International Journal of Speech…•2014

  • A Qualitative Account of Young People’s Experiences Seeking Care from Emergency Departments for Self-Harm

    Open Access•Sadhbh J Byrne, India Bellairs-Walsh et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Discussion Protocol for Alleviating Epistemic Injustice

    Open Access•Petra Auvinen, Jaana Parviainen et al.•Social Sciences•2021

  • Longitudinal Conversation Analysis - Introduction to the Special Issue

    Open Access•Arnulf Deppermann, Simona Pekarek Doehler•Research on Language and Social…•2021

  • The predictive state

    Open Access•Martin Mahony•Social Studies of Science•2013

  • Threats to epistemic agency in young people with unusual experiences and beliefs

    Open Access•Joseph W Houlders, Lisa Bortolotti et al.•Synthese•2021

  • The Epistemic Engine

    J Heritage•Research on Language and Social…•2012

  • Beginning to Respond

    Emanuel A Schegloff, Gene H Lerner•Research on Language and Social…•2009

  • Little Words That Matter

    Open Access•G B Bolden•Journal of Communication•2006

  • Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling

    T Stivers•Research on Language and Social…•2008

  • Negative stance towards treatment in psychosocial assessments

    Open Access•Clara Bergen, Rose Mccabe•Social Science & Medicine•2021

  • Qualitative study of candidacy and access to secondary mental health services during the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Elisa Liberati, Naomi Richards et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2022

  • From Engagement to Disengagement in a Psychiatric Assessment Process

    Open Access•Anssi Peräkylä, L Voutilainen et al.•Symbolic Interaction•2022

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año2
Intervalo de citas2026 - 2026 (1)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae