Addressing Mood Disorder Diagnosis' Stigma With an Honest, Open, Proud (HOP)-Based Intervention

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Bibliographic Data

ID15521047
AuthorsArlete Modelli (Universidade de São Paulo, corresponding author), Viviane Piagentini Candal Setti (0000-0003-3997-8412, Universidade de São Paulo), Martinus Theodorus van de Bilt (0000-0001-7916-5358, Universidade de São Paulo), Wagner F Gattaz (0000-0001-5215-4077, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), Alexandre A Loch (0000-0002-0006-8107, Universidade de São Paulo), Wulf Rössler (0000-0003-0049-4533, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin)
Year2021
Volume11
Pages582180-582180
Publication date2021-02-10
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Psychiatry (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1664-0640 • E-ISSN: 1664-0640
PublisherFrontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpsyt.2020.582180
PMID33643079
OpenAlexW3128397109
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited48

Introduction: The public stigma and self-stigma contribute to the dilemma of disclosing or not one's own mental illness diagnosis. Studies suggest that revealing it diminishes stress, besides helping with self-esteem. Honest, Open, Proud (HOP) is a group program that aids in the process of deciding on it, reducing its impact. Considering the relevance of this issue, the present study aimed to apply a HOP-based intervention in a group of patients diagnosed with mood disorders. Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial was used, including 61 patients with mood disorders, of whom 31 were diagnosed with depression and 30 were diagnosed with bipolar disorder. They were randomly placed on the intervention (HOP) or the control group (unstructured psychoeducation). The evaluations occurred before (T0) and after (T1) the sessions. We administered eight scales, from which three presented relevant results: Coming Out with Mental Illness Scale (COMIS), Cognitive Appraisal of Stigma as a Stressor (CogApp), and Authenticity Scale. Results: The intervention groups (depression and bipolar) did not present a significant change regarding the decision to disclose their diagnostics. However, the depression group showed a decrease on the perception of stigma as a stressor (T0 = 0.50 vs. T1 = -1.45; p = 0.058). Improvements in post-intervention results were seen for both groups (depression and bipolar) on the Authenticity Scale-self-alienation subscale (T0 = 10.40 vs. T1 = 12.37, p = 0.058). Conclusion: Our HOP-based intervention appeared to be an important program to aid patients in facing stigma stress, showing positive effects, whether helping to diminish stress or to improve self-conscience, both of which have indirect effects on self-stigma. As it is a compact program, it can bring benefits when applying to public health institutions

Bipolar disorder · Intervention (counseling · Mental health · Mental illness · Mood · Psychiatry · Psychoeducation · Randomized controlled trial · Stigma (botany · Stressor · Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Clinical Psychology · Medicine · Mental Health Treatment and Access · Psychology · Internal Medicine

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access