Navigating in a value-driven practice
A study of a Dutch Recovery College as a learning, social, and organizational space
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15521673 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marloes van Wezel (0000-0002-8650-8053, Tilburg University, corresponding author), C Muusse (0000-0003-1746-1236, Trimbos Institute), Jenny Boumans (0000-0002-2980-5959, Trimbos Institute), Floris J A Scheerstra (Noterik (Netherlands)), Annelies Broos (Noterik (Netherlands)), Judith Lize (Noterik (Netherlands)), Karin Leunen (Noterik (Netherlands)), Martijn P M Kole (Utrecht University), Anthony Verspoor (Noterik (Netherlands)), Dike Van De Mheen (0000-0002-7918-1523, Tilburg University), Hans Kroon (0000-0002-2259-1628, Tilburg University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Pages | 1625779-1625779 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Psychiatry (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1664-0640 • E-ISSN: 1664-0640 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1625779 |
| PMID | 41169489 |
| OpenAlex | W4415230363 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 18 |
Our findings highlight how RCs facilitate opportunities for recovery by fostering spaces for collaborative learning, mutual support and co-creation, while also revealing the fragility of these spaces. Experiences in RC practice are highly context- and person dependent. Navigating in such practice therefore requires continuous reflection and dialogue among all involved. To allow for such a culture to emerge and sustain, organizational free space should be safeguarded, minimizing constraints or interference from external parties
Dimension (graph theory · Fragility · Organizational culture · Reflection (computer programming · Sensemaking · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Management and Organizational Studies · Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Engaging
Recovery from mental illness
Uses and abuses of recovery
Research co-design in health
Recovery
Qualitative research
Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (Coreq)
A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research
Successful Qualitative Research
Embracing the Social Nature of Recovery
Mechanisms of change and participant outcomes in a Recovery Education Centre for individuals transitioning from homelessness
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies
Ethnographic Returning, Qualitative Longitudinal Research and the Reflexive Analysis of Social Practice
Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research
Participatory Research for Health and Social Well-Being
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |