The Renfrew Unified Treatment for Eating Disorders and Comorbidity
Long-Term Effects of an Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Residential Treatment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15522693 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Heather Thompson-Brenner, Heather Thompson‐Brenner (0000-0001-8724-761X, corresponding author), Simar Singh (0000-0002-3170-2924, Drexel University), Taylor Gardner (0000-0002-2959-0986), Gayle Brooks, Gayle E Brooks, Melanie Smith (0000-0002-1818-1511), Melanie T Smith, Michael R Lowe (0000-0002-6301-9214, Drexel University), James F Boswell (0000-0001-6214-0787, University at Albany, State University of New York) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Pages | 641601-641601 |
| Publication date | 2021-03-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Psychiatry (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1664-0640 • E-ISSN: 1664-0640 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.641601 |
| PMID | 33746797 |
| OpenAlex | W3135628799 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 60 |
Background: The Renfrew Unified Treatment for Eating Disorders and Comorbidity (UT) is a transdiagnostic, emotion-focused treatment adapted for use in residential group treatment. This study examined the effect of UT implementation across five years of treatment delivery. Methods: Data were collected by questionnaire at admission, discharge (DC), and 6-month follow-up (6MFU). Patient outcomes were measured by the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire, Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale, Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ), Anxiety Sensitivity Index, and Southampton Mindfulness Scale. Data were analyzed for N = 345 patients treated with treatment-as-usual (TAU), and N = 2,763 treated with the UT in subsequent years. Results: Results from multilevel models demonstrated a significant interaction between implementation status (TAU vs. UT) and time, both linear and quadratic, for the depression, experiential avoidance, anxiety sensitivity, and mindfulness variables. Patients treated with the UT showed more improvement in these variables on average, as well as more rebound between DC and 6MFU. Results from multilevel models examining eating disorder outcome showed no significant difference between the TAU and UT for the full sample, but a significant three-way interaction indicated that the UT produced more improvement in the EDE-Q relative to the TAU particularly for patients who entered treatment with high levels of experiential avoidance (BEAQ score). Conclusion: This long-term study of a transdiagnostic, evidence-based treatment in residential care for eating disorders and comorbidity suggests implementation was associated with beneficial effects on depression and emotion function outcomes, as well as eating disorder severity for patients with high levels of baseline emotion regulation problems. These effects did not appear to diminish in the 5 years following initial implementation
Anxiety · Comorbidity · Depression (economics · Eating disorders · Experiential avoidance · Mindfulness · Multilevel model · Psychiatry · Clinical Psychology · Digital Mental Health Interventions · Eating Disorders and Behaviors · Medicine · Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions · Psychology
The Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire
Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency and the prediction of fearfulness
Evidence-based intervention sustainability strategies
Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images
The Sustainability of Evidence-Based Interventions and Practices in Public Health and Health Care
Development of a measure of experiential avoidance
Assessment of eating disorders
Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice
The CES-D Scale
The Renfrew Unified Treatment for Eating Disorders and Comorbidity
Risk and maintenance factors for eating pathology
Emotion regulation across eating pathology
Videotape Assessment of Changes in Aberrant Meal-time Behaviors in Anorexia Nervosa After Treatment
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,6 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |