Mortality risk in infants receiving therapeutic care for malnutrition

A secondary analysis

Bibliographic Data

ID15536974
AuthorsImteaz Mahmud (0000-0003-2117-6876, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, corresponding author), Benjamin Guesdon (0000-0002-2876-0533, Action Contre la Faim), Marko Kerac (0000-0002-3745-7317, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), Carlos S Grijalva-Eternod (0000-0002-2461-9954, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine)
Year2024
Volume20
Issue3
Pagese13635-e13635
Publication date2024-03-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMaternal and Child Nutrition (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1740-8695 • E-ISSN: 1740-8709
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/mcn.13635
PMID38433606
OpenAlexW4392373816
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited31

Small and nutritionally at-risk infants aged under 6 months (<6 months) are at high risk of death, but important evidence gaps exist on how to best identify them. We aimed to determine associations between anthropometric deficits and mortality among infants <6 months admitted to inpatient therapeutic care. A secondary analysis of 2002-2008 data included 5034 infants aged <6 months from 12 countries. We estimated the prevalence, concurrence, and severity of wasted, stunted, and underweight, as stand-alone indicators, and using the Composite Index of Anthropometric Failure (CIAF), which combines these indicators into six subgroups of single and multiple anthropometric deficits and into one combined indicator called CIAF. We used logistic regression to examine the association of different anthropometric deficits with in-programme mortality. Among 3692 infants aged <6 months with complete data, 3539 (95.8%) were underweight, 3058 (82.8%) were wasted, 2875 (77.8%) were stunted and 3575 (96.8%) had CIAF. Infants with multiple anthropometric deficits were presented with significantly lower anthropometric indices, that is, they were more severely wasted, stunted and underweight. A total of 141 infants died during inpatient therapeutic care. Among these, severely wasted (116) and severely underweight (138) infants had higher odds of mortality than normal infants (odds ratio [OR] = 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-2.7, p = 0.009, and OR = 3.3, 95% CI: 0.8-13.6, p = 0.09, respectively). Boys had higher odds of inpatient mortality than girls (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.02-1.92, p = 0.03). Mortality was only observed in infants <6 months presenting multiple anthropometric deficits, although their odds of mortality were not significant, for example, OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 0.5-10.0, p = 0.21 for stunted, wasted and underweight infants <6 months. In conclusion, multiple anthropometric deficits (CIAF) is common among infants <6 months and may be reported in nutrition care programmes and surveys. Both weight-for-length/height z-score and weight-for-age z-score were found to be useful indicators for programme admission and in-programme prognosis. Future work needs to explore which better accounts for admission bias. Boys appear to be most at-risk of dying while receiving malnutrition therapeutic care. Programmes should ensure that all infants receive timely, evidence-based, effective care

Anthropometry · Body mass index · Confidence interval · Environmental health · Logistic regression · Malnutrition · Odds ratio · Overweight · Population · Underweight · Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Infant Development and Preterm Care · Medicine · Internal Medicine · Pediatrics

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access