Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The emerging market hype – putting market size and growth in BRIC countries into perspective

Bibliographic Data

ID15539149
AuthorsDavid B Heinz (University of Strathclyde, corresponding author), Matthias Tomenendal (0000-0002-9689-0524, Berlin School of Economics and Law)
Year2012
Volume8
Issue3
Pages241-258
Publication date2012-07-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Perspectives on International Business (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1742-2043 • E-ISSN: 1758-6062
PublisherEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1108/17422041211254969
OpenAlexW2061522276
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited36

Purpose There is a stream of literature highlighting the enormous growth potential of emerging markets. This literature forms the basis for strategic investment decisions made by multinational corporations (MNCs). Seeking to question the findings of this literature, this paper aims to undertake a comparison of the BRIC countries with that of Germany as a representative mature market to put into perspective the short to medium‐term market potential of BRIC markets. Design/methodology/approach An analysis of the geographical investment priorities of 25 DAX multinationals operating in the real economy and a statistical comparison of market size and growth between BRIC countries and Germany are undertaken. Findings While the majority of the DAX companies examined focused their strategic investment priorities on emerging markets, the short‐ to mid‐term revenue potential of the BRIC countries – currently the most important emerging markets – are expected to be lower in absolute terms than those for mature markets such as Germany. This holds true on several levels of granularity, such as GPD per capita, size and growth of high‐income market segments. Research limitations/implications The considerable “hype” surrounding focusing investment on emerging markets needs closer scrutiny. Further research is required to subject the reasons behind the strategic investments of MNCs in BRIC countries to more detailed analysis. This encompasses, for example, a closer consideration of the extent to which messages from the company reports might not reflect true strategic priorities but rather represent a means of public relations or tactical ploys. Next, the impact of real long‐term expectations and potential bandwagon effects require further study. Finally, a comprehensive theoretical model placing emerging market growth into a broader perspective has yet to be developed. Practical implications Decision makers in business, government and NGOs should not be misled by the “hype” surrounding emerging markets. In many industries, BRIC countries do and will provide smaller markets when compared to mature markets like Germany. Originality/value Direct comparison of market growth in the BRIC countries and that in Germany reveals greater short‐ to medium‐term absolute growth potential in Germany, a fact often ignored by current literature on international growth strategies and not reflected in the growth priorities published by German DAX companies

BRIC · Business · Economics · Emerging markets · Industrial organization · International economics · International trade · Investment (military · Multinational corporation · Political science · Revenue · Scrutiny · Economic Growth and Productivity · Global trade and economics · International Business and FDI · Finance

  • Multinational enterprises and economic inequality

    Open Access•Asmund Rygh•Critical Perspectives on…•2019

  • Declining industries in emerging economies and firms’ strategies

    Open Access•Hao Tan•Critical Perspectives on…•2022

  • Time to call time on emerging markets

    Open Access•Yusaf H Akbar•Critical Perspectives on…•2022

  • Reflective and cognitive perspectives on international capital budgeting

    Open Access•Avo Schönbohm, Anastasia Zahn•Critical Perspectives on…•2016

  • Why growth rates differ

    Edward Fulton Denison•Why growth rates differ•1967

  • Oligopolistic Reaction and Multinational Enterprise

    Open Access•Frederick T Knickerbocker•Rugman reviews international…•2009

  • Economic Growth of Nations

    Simon Kuznets•Economic Growth of Nations•1971

  • Trade, Location of Economic Activity and the MNE

    John H Dunning•International Allocation of…•1977

  • Multinational enterprises and the global economy

    John H Dunning, John Dunning et al.•Transnational Corporations•2010

  • Oligopolistic reaction and multinational enterprise

    Open Access•Frederick T Knickerbocker•The International Executive•1973

  • Global Shift

    Steven Musson•Journal of Economic Geography•2004

  • Awakening Giants, Feet of Clay

    Open Access•Pranab Bardhan•Journal of South Asian Development•2006

  • The GDP paradox

    Open Access•J C J M Van Den Bergh•Journal of Economic Psychology•2009

  • The Big Ten

    Richard N Cooper, Jeffrey E Garten•Foreign Affairs•1997

  • The Myth behind China's Miracle

    George J Gilboy•Foreign Affairs•2004

  • The Myth of Asia's Miracle

    Paul Krugman•Foreign Affairs•1994

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,4
Citation span2016 - 2022 (7)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae