Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ignorant and impatient internationalization

The Uppsala model and internationalization patterns for Internet‐related firms

Bibliographic Data

ID15539250
AuthorsMats Forsgren (Uppsala University, corresponding author), Peter Hagström (Stockholm School of Economics)
EditorsRudolf R Sinkovics (0000-0002-4471-5054)
Year2007
Volume3
Issue4
Pages291-305
Publication date2007-10-20
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Perspectives on International Business (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1742-2043 • E-ISSN: 1758-6062
PublisherEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1108/17422040710832559
OpenAlexW1529604451
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited27

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine to what extent classical models of firms' internationalization process can explain behavior among totally new types of firms. More specifically, we confront the traditional so‐called Uppsala model of internationalization with data and experiences from such firms in order to analyze and discuss some basic elements in the model. Design/methodology/approach Case studies of newly established and fast growing Internet‐related firms – rather dissimilar to the firms on which the Uppsala model was originally based – are examined. Findings The paper finds that, first, incremental behavior does not seem to be of major concern for our Internet‐related firms, at least not in comparison with factors related to first‐mover‐advantage or following‐the‐herd behavior. Second, stakeholders other than those included in the Uppsala model seemed to have a profound influence on the studied firms, forcing them to go abroad much faster than the model would predict. Third, related to the former point, the existence of an explicit and active internationalization strategy was observed among the firms, not fully in line with the reactive and adaptive firm behavior in the Uppsala model. Originality/value The results indicate that the internationalization behavior of new types of firms like Internet‐related firms might deviate considerably from what the Uppsala model predicts. However, as this behavior was far from successful in the studied cases, the results also indicate that the managerial implications of the Uppsala model are maybe more relevant than were originally intended

Business · Economics · First-mover advantage · Forcing (mathematics · Industrial organization · International trade · Internationalization · Order (exchange · Originality · Process (computing · Sociology · The Internet · Value (mathematics · Computer Science · Global trade and economics · Innovation and Knowledge Management · International Business and FDI · Marketing

  • Parachuting internationalization

    Open Access•Tula Fang, Rosalie L Tung et al.•Cross Cultural & Strategic…•2017

  • ICT and MNE reorganisation

    Open Access•Mo Yamin, Rudolf R Sinkovics•Critical Perspectives on…•2007

  • An integrative model of internationalization strategies

    Open Access•Xin Li, Jens Gammelgaard•Critical Perspectives on…•2014

  • Critical and mainstream international business research

    Open Access•Christoph Dörrenbächer, Jens Gammelgaard•Critical Perspectives on…•2019

  • Does digital transformation matter for international diversification? The role of product market competition

    Open Access•Rayenda Khresna Brahmana, Maria Kontesa et al.•Critical Perspectives on…•2024

  • MNCs’ open international strategy–local dynamics

    Open Access•Martina Fuchs•Critical Perspectives on…•2020

  • Situated between headquarters and local environment

    Open Access•Martina Fuchs, Johannes Westermeyer•Critical Perspectives on…•2023

  • Uberization in Paris – the issue of trust between a digital platform and digital workers

    Open Access•Robert Wentrup, Hiroki Nakamura et al.•Critical Perspectives on…•2018

  • Are Neoclassic Internationalization Models Enduring? A Case-Review of the Uppsala Paradigm

    Open Access•Bruno F Abrantes•SAGE Open•2020

  • Internationalisation of born global firms

    Sulina Kaur, Manjit Singh Sandhu•Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy•2013

  • Organizational Learning

    Barbara Levitt, James G March•Annual Review of Sociology•1988

  • International Production and the Multinational Enterprise (RLE International Business)

    John H Dunning•International Production and the…•2014

  • The Future of the Multinational Enterprise

    Open Access•Peter J Buckley, Mark Casson•Future of the Multinational…•1976

  • The Mechanism of Internationalisation

    Open Access•Jan Johanson, Jan‐Erik Vahlne•International Marketing Review•1990

  • Trade, Location of Economic Activity and the MNE

    John H Dunning•International Allocation of…•1977

  • Organizational Learning

    George P Huber•Organization Science•1991

  • The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields

    P Dimaggio, Paul J Dimaggio et al.•Economics meets sociology in…•2004

  • Globalization of Smaller Firms

    Open Access•rinivas B Prasad•Small Business Economics•1999

  • "The Science of "Muddling Through

    Charles E Lindblom•Public Administration Review•1959

  • The Iron Cage Revisited

    P Dimaggio, Paul J Dimaggio et al.•American Sociological Review•1983

Citations per year0.53
Citation span2007 - 2024 (18)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae