Pragmatic evaluation of transdisciplinary research on gender equity in the New Zealand public service

Datos Bibliográficos

ID15543741
AutoresJane Parker (0000-0002-3364-8116, autor de correspondencia), Amanda Young‐Hauser (0000-0003-2378-3362), Amanda Young-Hauser, J Sayers (0000-0002-6289-3436), Patricia Loga (0000-0001-8311-7164), Selu Paea, Shirley Barnett
Año2021
Volumen17
Número1
Páginas41-60
Fecha de publicación2021-09-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaQualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1746-5648 • E-ISSN: 1746-5656
EditorialEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1108/qrom-01-2021-2097
OpenAlexW3196734862
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas38

Purpose Despite the need for such, little scholarly attention has been paid to transdisciplinary enquiry into gender inequities in workplaces. The authors provide a pragmatic evaluation of the transdisciplinary research (TDR) model by Hall et al. (2012) for framing the study of this societal issue, shedding light on the challenges, principles and values that could usefully inform subsequent TDR in organisational settings. Design/methodology/approach This paper evaluates the model in relation to TDR on gender inequities in New Zealand's public service by Hall et al. (2012) Content analysis on our reflective narratives from research team meetings, email exchanges, informal discussions and a workshop reveals TDR study insights. Findings show support for the model and its four broad phases and surface principles and values for applied TDR enquiry that addresses societal challenges in the organisational context. Findings The adoption of a TDR model to examine a study of equity in the public service revealed practical and conceptual challenges, encouraging ongoing reflection and adaptive behaviour on the researchers' part. The pragmatic evaluation also highlighted environmental constraints on undertaking TDR, with implications for the ambition of future studies. Research limitations/implications This evaluative enquiry encourages similar research in other organisational and national settings to validate the use of TDR to gain insightful, contextualised understandings of social challenges centred in the organisational setting. Practical implications This pragmatic evaluation of a TDR model's capacity to approximate the approach and phases of our applied enquiry lays the groundwork to refining TDR approaches used in subsequent studies aimed at addressing societal issues in the organisational setting. Social implications This paper can potentially promote greater collaboration between research scholars and other stakeholders wanting to develop TDR paradigms and applied enquiry that can meaningfully inform workplace and societal impacts. Originality/value This pragmatic evaluation of a TDR approach involves its initial application to the study of equity at work and develops principles and values that could inform TDR paradigms and methodologies of subsequent enquiries in the field

Conceptual framework · Context (archaeology · Engineering ethics · Equity (law · Framing (construction · Narrative · Political science · Public relations · Public service · Social science · Sociology · Engineering · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration