Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assessing the costs and benefits of US renewable portfolio standards

Bibliographic Data

ID15544802
AuthorsRyan Wiser (0000-0002-2540-1092, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, corresponding author), Trieu Mai (0000-0003-1751-3892, National Laboratory of the Rockies), Dev Millstein (0000-0002-8091-0535, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), Galen Barbose (0000-0003-4687-2309, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), Lori Bird (0000-0002-9190-4333, National Laboratory of the Rockies), Jenny Heeter (0000-0003-4768-6663, National Laboratory of the Rockies), David Keyser (National Laboratory of the Rockies), Venkat Krishnan (0000-0002-7788-0670, National Laboratory of the Rockies), Jordan Macknick (0000-0001-5565-8879, National Laboratory of the Rockies)
Year2017
Volume12
Issue9
Pages094023-094023
Publication date2017-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/aa87bd
OpenAlexW2759677496
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited6

Renewable portfolio standards (RPS) exist in 29 US states and the District of Columbia. This article summarizes the first national-level, integrated assessment of the future costs and benefits of existing RPS policies; the same metrics are evaluated under a second scenario in which widespread expansion of these policies is assumed to occur. Depending on assumptions about renewable energy technology advancement and natural gas prices, existing RPS policies increase electric system costs by as much as $31 billion, on a present-value basis over 2015−2050. The expanded renewable deployment scenario yields incremental costs that range from $23 billion to $194 billion, depending on the assumptions employed. The monetized value of improved air quality and reduced climate damages exceed these costs. Using central assumptions, existing RPS policies yield $97 billion in air-pollution health benefits and $161 billion in climate damage reductions. Under the expanded RPS case, health benefits total $558 billion and climate benefits equal $599 billion. These scenarios also yield benefits in the form of reduced water use. RPS programs are not likely to represent the most cost effective path towards achieving air quality and climate benefits. Nonetheless, the findings suggest that US RPS programs are, on a national basis, cost effective when considering externalities

Air quality index · Business · Climate change · Cost–benefit analysis · Damages · Economics · Environmental economics · Externality · Microeconomics · Natural gas · Natural gas prices · Natural resource economics · Portfolio · Renewable energy · Yield (engineering · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Energy and Environment Impacts · Engineering · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Finance

  • Assessing spatial consumer preferences for renewable portfolio standards considering energy mix and water consumption

    Open Access•Saleh Mamun, Jamal Mamkhezri et al.•Utilities Policy•2026

  • Seizing the policy opportunities for health- and equity-improving energy decisions

    Open Access•Wei Peng, Susan Anenberg et al.•One Earth•2025

  • Supporting energy technology deployment while avoiding unintended technological lock-in

    Open Access•Leonore Haelg, Marius Zumwald et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • The global climate value of offshore wind energy

    Open Access•Alexana Cranmer, Erin Baker•Environmental Research Letters•2020

  • Renewable Portfolio Standards and Policy Stringency

    Open Access•Nikolay Anguelov, William F Dooley•Review of Policy Research•2019

  • Modeling low-carbon US electricity futures to explore impacts on national and regional water use

    Open Access•Steve Clemmer, John Rogers et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2013

  • The social cost of carbon

    Open Access•Laurie T Johnson, Starla Yeh et al.•Journal of Environmental Studies…•2013

  • Clean-energy policies and electricity sector carbon emissions in the U.S. states

    Open Access•Hongtao Yi•Utilities Policy•2015

  • Regulatory Stringency and Policy Drivers

    Open Access•Sanya Carley, Chris Miller et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2012

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,63
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae