Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A retrospective analysis of funding and focus in US advanced fission innovation

Bibliographic Data

ID15545010
AuthorsAhmed Abdulla (0000-0003-4980-1717, University of California San Diego, corresponding author), Michael J Ford (0000-0002-9040-9664, Carnegie Mellon University), Michael G Morgan (0000-0003-1384-5814, Carnegie Mellon University), David G Victor (0000-0003-1136-0354, University of California San Diego)
Year2017
Volume12
Issue8
Pages084016-084016
Publication date2017-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/aa7f10
OpenAlexW2743686811
LanguageEN
References cited6

Deep decarbonization of the global energy system will require large investments in energy innovation and the deployment of new technologies. While many studies have focused on the expenditure that will be needed, here we focus on how government has spent public sector resources on innovation for a key carbon-free technology: advanced nuclear. We focus on nuclear power because it has been contributing almost 20% of total US electric generation, and because the US program in this area has historically been the world’s leading effort. Using extensive data acquired through the Freedom of Information Act, we reconstruct the budget history of the Department of Energy’s program to develop advanced, non-light water nuclear reactors. Our analysis shows that—despite spending $2 billion since the late 1990s—no advanced design is ready for deployment. Even if the program had been well designed, it still would have been insufficient to demonstrate even one non-light water technology. It has violated much of the wisdom about the effective execution of innovative programs: annual funding varies fourfold, priorities are ephemeral, incumbent technologies and fuels are prized over innovation, and infrastructure spending consumes half the budget. Absent substantial changes, the possibility of US-designed advanced reactors playing a role in decarbonization by mid-century is low

Business · Economics · Environmental economics · Government (linguistics · Natural resource economics · Nuclear power · Software deployment · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Computer Science · Global Energy and Sustainability Research · Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae