Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An inter-comparison of the social costs of air quality from reduced-complexity models

Bibliographic Data

ID15547352
AuthorsE A Gilmore (0000-0002-9037-6751, Clark University, corresponding author), Jinhyok Heo (0000-0003-0348-4111, Carnegie Mellon University), Nicholas Z Muller (0000-0003-1712-6526, National Bureau of Economic Research), Christopher W Tessum (0000-0002-8864-7436, University of Washington), Jason Hill (0000-0001-7609-6713, University of Minnesota), Julian D Marshall (0000-0003-4087-1209, University of Washington), P J Adams (0000-0003-0041-058X, Carnegie Mellon University)
Year2019
Volume14
Issue7
Pages074016-074016
Publication date2019-04-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ab1ab5
OpenAlexW2938829834
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited32

Reliable estimates of externality costs—such as the costs arising from premature mortality due to exposure to fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 )—are critical for policy analysis. To facilitate broader analysis, several datasets of the social costs of air quality have been produced by a set of reduced-complexity models (RCMs). It is much easier to use the tabulated marginal costs derived from RCMs than it is to run ‘state-of-the-science’ chemical transport models (CTMs). However, the differences between these datasets have not been systematically examined, leaving analysts with no guidance on how and when these differences matter. Here, we compare per-tonne marginal costs from ground level and elevated emission sources for each county in the United States for sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), nitrogen oxides (NO x ), ammonia (NH 3 ) and inert primary PM 2.5 from three RCMs: Air Pollution Emission Experiments and Policy (AP2), Estimating Air pollution Social Impacts Using Regression (EASIUR) and the Intervention Model for Air Pollution (InMAP). National emission-weighted average damages vary among models by approximately 21%, 31%, 28% and 12% for inert primary PM 2.5 , SO 2 , NO x and NH 3 emissions, respectively, for ground-level sources. For elevated sources, emission-weighted damages vary by approximately 42%, 26%, 42% and 20% for inert primary PM 2.5 , SO 2 , NO x and NH 3 emissions, respectively. Despite fundamental structural differences, the three models predict marginal costs that are within the same order of magnitude. That different and independent methods have converged on similar results bolsters confidence in the RCMs. Policy analyzes of national-level air quality policies that sum over pollutants and geographical locations are often robust to these differences, although the differences may matter for more source- or location-specific analyzes. Overall, the loss of fidelity caused by using RCMs and their social cost datasets in place of CTMs is modest

Air pollution · Air quality index · Atmospheric sciences · Damages · Econometrics · Economics · Externality · Geography · Meteorology · Particulates · Physics · Social cost · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Chemistry · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Environmental Science · Vehicle emissions and performance · Pollution

  • PM 2.5 polluters disproportionately and systemically affect people of color in the United States

    Open Access•Christopher W Tessum, David A Paolella et al.•Science Advances•2021

  • The social costs of health- and climate-related on-road vehicle emissions in the continental United States from 2008 to 2017

    Open Access•Sarah Zelasky, Jonathan J Buonocore•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • Distributional health impacts of electricity imports in the United States

    Open Access•Eleanor M Hennessy, Jacques A de Chalendar et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • Integrating air quality and health considerations into power sector decarbonization strategies

    Open Access•Wei Peng, Yang Ou•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • Integrating Air Quality and Public Health Benefits in U.S. Decarbonization Strategies

    Open Access•Ciaran L Gallagher, Tracey Holloway•Frontiers in Public Health•2020

  • A decade of the U.S. energy mix transitioning away from coal

    Open Access•Jonathan J Buonocore, Parichehr Salimifard et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • Evaluating human mortality impacts from air pollution as U.S. commuting reaches its extremes

    Open Access•Yue Jing, Yujie Hu et al.•Journal of Transport Geography•2025

  • Distributional impacts of fleet-wide change in light duty transportation

    Open Access•Madalsa Singh, Christopher W Tessum et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • Regional and county flows of particulate matter damage in the US

    Open Access•Brian Sergi, Inês L Azevedo et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2020

  • Air pollution mortality from India’s coal power plants

    Open Access•Kirat Singh, Tapas Peshin et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • State-level drivers of future fine particulate matter mortality in the United States

    Open Access•Yang Ou, Steven J Smith et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2019

  • What are the best combinations of fuel-vehicle technologies to mitigate climate change and air pollution effects across the United States

    Open Access•Fan Tong, Inês L Azevedo•Environmental Research Letters•2020

  • Environmental Accounting for Pollution in the United States Economy

    Nicholas Z Muller, Rebecca Mendelsohn et al.•American Economic Review•2011

  • Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model

    Open Access•Georg A Grell, Georg Grell et al.•Atmospheric Environment (1967)•2005

Unique citing works12
Citations per year1,71
Citation span2019 - 2025 (7)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 12

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae