Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Conspiratory fascination versus public interest

The case of ‘climategate’

Bibliographic Data

ID15548670
AuthorsLewandowsky (0000-0003-1655-2013, University of Bristol, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume9
Issue11
Pages111004-111004
Publication date2014-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/111004
OpenAlexW2126829064
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited26

Anderegg and Goldsmith (2014 Environ. Res. Lett. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/5/054005 9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/5/054005 ) use Google Trends to examine the impact of specific media events—the so-called ‘climategate’ imbroglio and the glacial-melt error in the IPCCʼs 2007 report—on public opinion regarding climate change. There has been an overall decline of public interest in climate change after 2007, accompanied by spikes of interest with a half-life of six days for these two media events. The brevity of public interest in ‘climategate’ stands in contrast to the continued and growing fascination of the ‘skeptic’ blogosphere with that event. These results document the assertion that conspiratory obsession by a small number of people should not be mistaken for general public interest

Assertion · Blogosphere · Climate change · Epistemology · Media event · Political science · Public interest · Public opinion · Skepticism · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Computer Science · Media Studies and Communication · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Geology · History · Law · Philosophy

  • Climate and environmental science denial

    Open Access•Karin Edvardsson Björnberg, Mikael Karlsson et al.•Journal of Cleaner Production•2017

  • Blogging about Climate Change in Russia

    Marianna Poberezhskaya•Environmental Communication•2018

  • Recurrent fury

    Open Access•Lewandowsky, John Cook et al.•Journal of Social and Political…•2015

  • Rhetorical Strategies for Scientific Authority

    Meritxell Ramírez-I-Ollé, Meritxell Ramírez‐i‐ollé•Science as Culture•2015

  • Coping with an antagonistic climate

    Open Access•Laila Mendy, Mikael Karlsson•AMBIO•2025

  • The ‘Alice in Wonderland’ mechanics of the rejection of (climate) science

    Open Access•Lewandowsky, Stephan Lewandowsky et al.•Synthese•2018

  • Is it appropriate to ‘target’ inappropriate dissent? on the normative consequences of climate skepticism

    Open Access•Anna Leuschner•Synthese•2018

  • The Rise of Global Warming Skepticism

    Open Access•Nicholas Smith, Anthony Leiserowitz•Risk Analysis•2012

  • ‘Climategate’

    Open Access•Brigitte Nerlich•Environmental Values•2010

  • Manufactured Scientific Controversy

    Luca Ceccarelli, Leah Ceccarelli•Rhetoric and Public Affairs•2011

  • The half-life of a “teachable moment”

    Open Access•Ayelet Baram-Tsabari, Elad Segev•Public Understanding of Science•2015

  • Of Conspiracy Theories

    Brian L Keeley, Brian Keeley•The Journal of Philosophy•1999

  • The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science

    Open Access•Lewandowsky, Stephan Lewandowsky et al.•Nature Climate Change•2012

  • Nasa Faked the Moon Landing—Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax

    Open Access•Lewandowsky, Klaus Oberauer et al.•Psychological Science•2013

  • Cross-national comparison of the presence of climate scepticism in the print media in six countries, 2007–10

    Open Access•John Painter, James Painter et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2012

  • Public interest in climate change over the past decade and the effects of the ‘climategate’ media event

    Open Access•William R L Anderegg, Gregory R Goldsmith•Environmental Research Letters•2014

  • The legacy of climategate

    Open Access•Edward W Maibach, Anthony Leiserowitz et al.•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2012

  • Lost in Translation

    Gert Goeminne•Global Environmental Politics•2012

  • Between hype and decline

    Open Access•Beate Ratter, Beate M W Ratter et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2012

  • Conspiracy Theories

    Open Access•Cass R Sunstein, Adrian Vermeule•Journal of Political Philosophy•2008

  • Climate change prediction

    Open Access•Keynyn Brysse, Naomi Oreskes et al.•Global Environmental Change•2012

  • Global warming estimates, media expectations, and the asymmetry of scientific challenge☆

    Open Access•William R Freudenburg, Violetta Muselli•Global Environmental Change•2010

  • Declining public concern about climate change

    Open Access•Lyle Scruggs, Salil D Benegal et al.•Global Environmental Change•2012

  • Political paranoia v. political realism

    Jeffrey M Bale•Patterns of Prejudice•2007

  • Peak energy and climate change

    Open Access•Jörg Friedrichs•Futures•2011

  • Contesting Science by Appealing to Its Norms

    Open Access•R Jaspal, Brigitte Nerlich et al.•Science Communication•2013

  • Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere

    Open Access•Gordon Gauchat•American Sociological Review•2012

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,64
Citation span2015 - 2025 (11)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae