Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Effectiveness of regulatory policy in curbing deforestation in a biodiversity hotspot

Bibliographic Data

ID15548849
AuthorsB Alexander Simmons (0000-0002-1918-3463, The University of Queensland, corresponding author), Kerrie A Wilson (0000-0002-0092-935X, The University of Queensland), Raymundo Marcos-Martinez (0000-0002-7925-7081, University of South Australia), Brett A Bryan (0000-0003-4834-5641, Deakin University), Oakes Holland (0000-0002-4185-4438, The University of Queensland), Elizabeth A Law (0000-0003-4456-1259, The University of Queensland)
Year2018
Volume13
Issue12
Pages124003-124003
Publication date2018-11-23
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/aae7f9
OpenAlexW2902223495
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited37

Recent rates of deforestation on private lands in Australia rival deforestation hotspots around the world, despite conservation policies in place to avert deforestation. This study uses causal impact estimation techniques to determine if a controversial conservation policy-the Vegetation Management Act (VMA)-has successfully reduced deforestation of remnant trees in the Brigalow Belt South, a 21.6 Mha biodiversity hotspot in Queensland. We use covariate matching to determine the regulatory effect of the policy on deforestation rates over time, compared to two counterfactual scenarios representing upper and lower estimates of policy impact. The VMA significantly reduced the rate of remnant deforestation in the highest impact scenario, saving 17, 7291733 ha during 2000-2016. In the lowest scenario, 'panic clearing' before and after enactment of the VMA minimized the amount of remnant forests saved and may have marginally increased deforestation relative to the counterfactual (-404617 ha). At peak effectiveness, the VMA successfully counteracted the amount of remnant deforestation during 2010-2012, but this only represents 4.78% of the 371, 252 ha of remnant forests cleared in the bioregion since enactment in 1999. Thus, while deforestation rates in the region have substantially reduced since the policy was enacted, our results of positive yet limited direct regulatory impact suggests the policy's effectiveness is strongly confounded by other deforestation drivers, like changing socio-economic or climate conditions, as well as new social signals provoked by the policy. The mechanisms through which the policy influences deforestation behavior must be further investigated to ensure real, desirable change is achieved

Biodiversity · Biodiversity hotspot · Biology · Counterfactual thinking · Deforestation (computer science · Economics · Geography · Natural resource economics · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Forest Management and Policy · Ecology

  • Socioeconomic and policy-triggered land use/land cover change in the Alwero Watershed, Gambela Region, Ethiopia

    Open Access•Yitayh Leul, Shimeles Damene•Land Use Policy•2026

  • Trends in tropical forest loss and the social value of emission reductions

    Open Access•Thomas Knoke, Nick Hanley et al.•Nature Sustainability•2023

  • Designing an expert-led Bayesian network to understand interactions between policy instruments for adoption of eco-friendly farming practices

    Open Access•Helen J Mayfield, Rachel Eberhard et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2023

  • An evaluation of the effectiveness of Critical Biodiversity Areas, identified through a systematic conservation planning process, to reduce biodiversity loss outside protected areas in South Africa

    Open Access•Lize von Staden, Mervyn C Lötter et al.•Land Use Policy•2022

  • Psychosocial drivers of land management behaviour

    Open Access•B Alexander Simmons, Kerrie A Wilson et al.•AMBIO•2021

  • Place in legal geography

    Open Access•Roland Bartel, Nanette Graham•Geographical Research•2023

  • Evidence-based Policy

    Ray Pawson•Evidence-based Policy•2006

  • Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation

    Open Access•Kwaw S Andam, Paul J Ferraro et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2008

  • Social Norms and Global Environmental Challenges

    Ann P Kinzig, P R Ehrlich et al.•BioScience•2013

  • Limits of Brazil’s Forest Code as a means to end illegal deforestation

    Open Access•Andréa Aguiar Azevedo, Raoni Rajão et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2017

  • Do Payments for Environmental Services Affect Forest Cover? A Farm-Level Evaluation from Costa Rica

    Rodrigo Arriagada, Rodrigo A Arriagada et al.•Land Economics•2012

  • Evaluation of biodiversity policy instruments

    Daniela A Miteva, Subhrendu K Pattanayak et al.•Oxford Review of Economic Policy•2012

  • The Estimation of Causal Effects by Difference-in-Difference Methods

    Michael Lechner•Foundations and Trends® in…•2011

  • Land Reform Policies, the Sources of Violent Conflict, and Implications for Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon

    Open Access•Lee J Alston, Gary D Libecap et al.•Journal of Environmental…•2000

  • Mainstreaming Impact Evaluation in Nature Conservation

    Open Access•Kathy Baylis, Jordi Honey-Rosés et al.•Conservation Letters•2016

  • The Millennium Drought in southeast Australia (2001–2009)

    Open Access•Albert I J M van Dijk, Hylke E Beck et al.•Water Resources Research•2013

  • Explaining farmers' conservation behaviour

    Open Access•Jason Beedell, J D C Beedell et al.•Journal of Environmental Management•1999

  • Counterfactual thinking and impact evaluation in environmental policy

    Open Access•Paul J Ferraro•New Directions for Evaluation•2009

  • Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects

    Guido W Imbens, Joshua D Angrist•Econometrica•1994

  • Dialogue Between Past and Present

    Open Access•Diana Perche•Australian Journal of Politics &…•2011

  • When Do Property Rights Matter? Open Access, Informal Social Controls, and Deforestation in the Ecuadorian Amazon

    Thomas Rudel•Human Organization•1995

  • Frequent policy uncertainty can negate the benefits of forest conservation policy

    Open Access•B Alexander Simmons, Raymundo Marcos-Martinez et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2018

  • Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon

    Open Access•Caroline Schmidt, Caroline A Schmidt et al.•Social & Legal Studies•2014

  • Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions

    Open Access•Eric F Lambin, Patrick Meyfroidt et al.•Global Environmental Change•2014

  • Tropical Forest Transitions and Globalization

    Christian A Kull, Christian Kull et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2007

  • Spatial and temporal patterns of land clearing during policy change

    Open Access•B Alexander Simmons, Elizabeth A Law et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Agricultural land-use dynamics

    Open Access•Raymundo Marcos-Martinez, Brett A Bryan et al.•Land Use Policy•2017

  • Contentious Land Change in the Amazon's Arc of Deforestation

    Stephen Aldrich, Robert Toovey Walker et al.•Annals of the Association of…•2012

  • Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation

    Guido W Imbens, Jeffrey M Wooldridge•Journal of Economic Literature•2009

  • The Estimation of Causal Effects From Observational Data

    C Winship, Stephen L Morgan•Annual Review of Sociology•1999

  • Changing Social Norms

    Jean Ensminger, Jack Knight•Current Anthropology•1997

Citations per year1.2
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae