Using reclaimed water to cope with water scarcity

An alternative for agricultural irrigation in Spain

Bibliographic Data

ID15550341
AuthorsMario Ballesteros-Olza (0000-0003-1756-7727, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, corresponding author), Irene Blanco‐Gutiérrez (0000-0002-6105-3339, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid), Paloma Esteve (0000-0003-1216-9156, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid), Almudena Gómez‐Ramos (0000-0003-1419-5454, Universidad de Valladolid), Antonio Bolinches (0000-0002-7447-6138, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid)
Year2022
Volume17
Issue12
Pages125002-125002
Publication date2022-11-17
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/aca3bb
OpenAlexW4309622865
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited46

In water-stressed agricultural regions, reuse of reclaimed water has emerged as a promising alternative that improves supply reliability, alleviates water scarcity and contributes to circular economy. The European Union has recently launched several initiatives to facilitate the adoption of water reuse for irrigation. However, its adoption is still far below its potential in most areas. This is the case of the Western La Mancha aquifer, in central Spain, where reclaimed water reuse is considered an alternative source to groundwater that may contribute to reduce overexploitation. A stakeholder-based fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) was developed to provide insights into the current situation of reclaimed water reuse in this area, as well as to explore the outcomes of different simulated scenarios ( cost recovery, agricultural transformation, social awareness and political will increase ). The FCM-based dynamic simulations showed that political will increase would generate the highest increase of reclaimed water reuse in agriculture in the study area, providing the highest increase of water reuse in agriculture. Agricultural extensification and increased social awareness delivered similar positive outcomes, however, only public awareness campaigns would increase water reuse, with agricultural extensification outcomes being more oriented towards the reduction of water abstractions and pollution. The cost recovery scenario was the only one that resulted in non-desired changes, mainly caused by reduced farmers’ income due to higher costs of reclaimed water. Finally, the analysis also evidenced the key role that the newly enacted EU Water Reuse Regulation may play in promoting reclaimed water use, even reversing the negative outcomes of the cost recovery scenario

Agriculture · Business · Economics · Environmental planning · Farm water · Geography · Irrigation · Natural resource economics · Reclaimed water · Reuse · Scarcity · Waste management · Water conservation · Water resource management · Water scarcity · Cognitive Science and Mapping · Engineering · Environmental Science · Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Ecology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access