Peer Rejection and Group Autonomy in the Latency Stage
A Qualitative Analysis of Children’s Voices in the Classroom Context
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15714218 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hannah Fisher-Grafy (0000-0002-2090-8919, Bar-Ilan University), Hana Fisher-Grafy (Bar-Ilan University), Yael Malin (0000-0002-4982-601X, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 463-463 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-27 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Children (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2227-9067 • E-ISSN: 2227-9067 |
| Publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/children13040463 |
| OpenAlex | W7141694720 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 27 |
Background/Objectives: Social rejection during the latency stage is a significant risk factor for children’s emotional and social development. Whereas earlier research focused primarily on individual characteristics of rejected children, contemporary perspectives emphasize peer-group processes, including norm formation, hierarchies, and social status structures. Although autonomy has been widely examined as an individual developmental construct, less attention has been given to its possible collective expression within the classroom peer group. This study aimed to explore how children understand and experience group autonomy and to clarify its role in social status and peer rejection. Methods: Twelve classroom-based focus groups were conducted with 140 fifth-grade children from five public elementary schools in Israel. Discussions were initiated using a projective narrative describing ambiguous peer exclusion. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Coding was conducted independently by two researchers and refined through iterative comparison and reflexive procedures. Results: Three themes emerged: (1) a shared longing for classroom-based group autonomy and collective decision-making; (2) group autonomy as an implicit hierarchical criterion shaping social status, whereby reduced reliance on adults and alignment with peer norms were associated with higher status, while adult dependence was linked to marginalization; and (3) an ambivalent structure of autonomy, as children valued peer independence yet expressed fear of adult punishment and responsibility. Conclusions: Findings suggest that during the latency stage autonomy shifts toward a collectively organized peer-group process. Recognizing group autonomy as a developmental dimension may deepen understanding of social status and peer rejection within classroom contexts
Autonomy · Focus group · Narrative · Norm (philosophy · Peer group · Social rejection · Social relation · Thematic analysis · Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Early Childhood Education and Development
The Culture of Morality
Strange Situation Procedure
Issues and Challenges in Studying Parental Control
Adult Psychiatric Outcomes of Bullying and Being Bullied by Peers in Childhood and Adolescence
Bullying Prevalence Across Contexts
Long-term adult outcomes of peer victimization in childhood and adolescence
A Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Intervention Programs Designed to Support Autonomy
Does Rejection Hurt? An fMRI Study of Social Exclusion
From External Regulation to Self-Regulation
Parent Autonomy Support, Academic Achievement, and Psychosocial Functioning
The significance of attachment security for children’s social competence with peers
Attachment and development
Parent styles associated with children's self-regulation and competence in school.
Twenty Years' Research on Peer Victimization and Psychosocial Maladjustment
Leadership at Play in Preschool Children
Focus Groups as Qualitative Research
A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control
From “Me” to “We”
Exploring Intergroup Peer Exclusion
Focus groups with young people
Beyond Homophily
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations
Culturally Responsive Focus Groups
| Highly cited | No |
|---|