Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Parental Preferences for Expanded Newborn Screening

What Are the Limits

Bibliographic Data

ID15716308
AuthorsNicole Si Yan Liang (0000-0002-3765-0766, Hospital for Sick Children), Abby Watts-Dickens (University of Toronto), David Chitayat (0000-0003-1944-7294, Hospital for Sick Children), Riyana Babul‐Hirji (University of Toronto), Riyana Babul-Hirji (Department of Genetic Counselling, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada), Pranesh Chakraborty (0000-0002-7719-0821, Newborn Screening Ontario), Robin Z Hayeems (0000-0003-3269-8004, University of Toronto, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume10
Issue8
Pages1362-1362
Publication date2023-08-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueChildren (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2227-9067 • E-ISSN: 2227-9067
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/children10081362
PMID37628361
OpenAlexW4385696863
LanguageEN
References cited51

The use of next-generation sequencing technologies such as genomic sequencing in newborn screening (NBS) could enable the detection of a broader range of conditions. We explored parental preferences and attitudes towards screening for conditions for which varying types of treatment exist with a cross-sectional survey completed by 100 parents of newborns who received NBS in Ontario, Canada. The survey included four vignettes illustrative of hypothetical screening targets, followed by questions assessing parental attitudes. Chi-square tests were used to compare frequency distributions of preferences. Results show that most parents supported NBS for conditions for which only supportive interventions are available, but to a significantly lesser degree than those with disease-specific treatments (99% vs. 82-87%, p ≤ 0.01). For conditions without an effective treatment, the type of supportive care and age of onset of the condition did not significantly alter parent perceptions of risks and benefits. Parents are interested in expanded NBS for conditions with only supportive interventions in childhood, despite lower levels of perceived benefit for the child and greater anticipated anxiety from screen-positive results. These preferences suggest that the expansion of NBS may require ongoing deliberation of perceived benefits and risks and enhanced approaches to education, consent, and support

Anxiety · Deliberation · Family medicine · Newborn screening · Perception · Psychiatry · Psychological intervention · Clinical Psychology · Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities · Genomics and Rare Diseases · Medicine · Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics · Psychology · Pediatrics

  • Families’ Experiences with Newborn Screening

    Open Access•R Grob, Scott Roberts et al.•The Hastings Center Report•2018

  • Expectations and values about expanded newborn screening

    Open Access•Robin Z Hayeems, Fiona A Miller et al.•Health Expectations•2015

  • Parental Views on Newborn Next Generation Sequencing

    Open Access•Rebecca Moultrie, Rebecca R Moultrie et al.•Maternal and Child Health Journal•2020

  • Public trust in Dutch health care

    Open Access•G F M Straten, Roland D Friele et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2002

  • Absorbing it all

    Open Access•Ashley L White, Felicity Boardman et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2021

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae