Responsible innovation as a critique of technology assessment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15735891 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Harro Van Lente (0000-0002-4719-360X, Maastricht University, corresponding author), Tsjalling Swierstra (0000-0001-5596-5633, Maastricht University), Pierre‐benoit Joly (Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Sciences, Innovations, Sociétés) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 254-261 |
| Publication date | 2017-05-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Responsible Innovation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2329-9037 • E-ISSN: 2329-9460 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23299460.2017.1326261 |
| OpenAlex | W2614610798 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 27 |
| References cited | 11 |
The notion of ‘responsible innovation’ has become fashionable amongst policy-makers and knowledge institutes. In the new Horizon 2020, calls of the EU ‘responsible research and innovation’ (RRI) figures prominently as a condition and an aim in itself. The rise of RRI shows considerable overlap with the aims, philosophies and practices of Technology Assessment (TA). The overlap, though, is not perfect and this raises questions about how RRI relates to TA. While it is plausible to interpret the relationship as RRI being a sequel of TA ambitions, we explore an alternative interpretation: RRI as a critique of TA
Economics · Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy · Political science · Positive economics · Public relations · Responsible Research and Innovation · Sociology · Innovation Policy and RD · Philosophy · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance · University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
Mission-Oriented Transition Assessment as a reflective approach to mission governance
Why We Need a Political Technology Assessment
Technology ethics assessment
Gene-editing technologies for developing climate resilient rice crops in sub-Saharan Africa
Opportunities and challenges of multidisciplinary algorithmic impact assessments
A short response to van Lente, Swierstra and Joly’s essay ‘Responsible innovation as a critique of technology assessment’
Phasing out an embedded technology
Generative Critique in Interdisciplinary Collaborations
The Mediating Role of Responsible Innovation in the Relationship between Stakeholder Pressure and Corporate Sustainability Performance in Times of Crisis
Values in responsible research and innovation
If you are for market creation, you should be for market destruction! Ethics and the relations between exnovation and innovation for changing direction
Entangled futures and responsibilities in technology assessment
What’s wrong with global challenges
Anticipation and its degrees of critical-reflective radicality
Responsible research and innovation as a travesty of technology assessment
Imagining socio-technical futures – challenges and opportunities for technology assessment
Ends of responsible innovation
Two tribes or more? The historical emergence of discourse coalitions of responsible research and innovation (rri) and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI)
Responding to difference in and for RI
Learning from failure
Responsible and safe innovation in education
Responsible innovation scholarship
Responsible Innovation as a source of inspiration for Technology Assessment, and vice versa
Social labs as an inclusive methodology to implement and study social change
Responsible business modelling for sustainability transitions
From Responsible Research and Innovation to responsibility by design
Constructing future scenarios as a tool to foster responsible research and innovation among future synthetic biologists
Responsible Innovation
What Is “Responsible” about Responsible Innovation? Understanding the Ethical Issues
Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields
The past and future of constructive technology assessment
A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation
The past and future of RRI
Adapt or perish? Assessing the recent shift in the European research funding arena from ‘Elsa’ to ‘RRI’
Acting in an uncertain world
| Unique citing works | 27 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2025 (9) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 27 |