Entangled futures and responsibilities in technology assessment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15736240 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Erik Fisher (0000-0002-7036-5852, Schlumberger (Ireland), corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 83-84 |
| Publication date | 2017-05-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Responsible Innovation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2329-9037 • E-ISSN: 2329-9460 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23299460.2017.1372061 |
| OpenAlex | W2756681978 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 12 |
Drawing upon decades of thought, critique, and learning about the social shaping of science and technology, responsible innovation (RI) benefits from numerous scholarly and policy precedents. Perha
Economics · Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Futures contract · Futures studies · Political science · Public relations · Responsible Research and Innovation · Social science · Sociology · Technology assessment · Technology policy · Computer Science · Engineering · Innovation and Socioeconomic Development · Law · Philosophy · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance · University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
Responsibilization through visions
Imagined technology futures in demand-oriented technology assessment
Assigning meaning to Nest by technology futures
Responsible research and innovation as a travesty of technology assessment
Technology assessment as a myth buster
Imagining socio-technical futures – challenges and opportunities for technology assessment
Eclectic, random, intuitive? Technology assessment, RRI, and their use of history
Responsible Innovation as a source of inspiration for Technology Assessment, and vice versa
The renaissance of techno-utopianism as a challenge for responsible innovation
Responsible innovation as a critique of technology assessment
A short response to van Lente, Swierstra and Joly’s essay ‘Responsible innovation as a critique of technology assessment’
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2024 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |