Selecting a Grounded Theory Approach for Nursing Research
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15736513 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Shaminder Singh (0000-0002-5076-0863, University of Calgary, corresponding author), Andrew Estefan (0000-0002-5309-1685, University of Calgary) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Pages | 2333393618799571-2333393618799571 |
| Publication date | 2018-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Global Qualitative Nursing Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2333-3936 • E-ISSN: 2333-3936 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/2333393618799571 |
| PMID | 30306099 |
| OpenAlex | W2895681440 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 27 |
| References cited | 14 |
Grounded theory is a commonly used research methodology. There are three primary approaches to grounded theory in nursing research: those espoused by Glaser, Strauss and Corbin, and Charmaz. All three approaches use similar procedures, yet there are important differences among them, which implies that researchers need to make careful choices when using grounded theory. Researchers new to grounded theory need to find the most appropriate approach that fits their research field, topic, and researcher position. In this article, we compare the three grounded theory approaches. Choices of a grounded theory approach will depend on the researcher's understanding of the philosophical underpinnings of all three approaches. Practical aspects of grounded theory approaches should match the information processing styles and analytical abilities of the researcher and the intended use of the theory. We illustrate key aspects of decision making about which method to select by drawing upon the first author's experiences in his doctoral research
Epistemology · Field (mathematics · Grounded theory · Key (lock · Management science · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Mathematics · Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation · Nursing education and management · Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
A Methodological Framework for Integrating Phenomenology and Grounded Theory in Health Professions Research
Exploring team collective voice
Analysis of network public opinion on Covid-19 epidemic based on the WSR theory
Just Listen! The importance of listening in foreign correspondents–governments relationships
Bridges to Civic Health
Hospital transfers from care homes
Patient perspectives on quality of care for depression and anxiety in primary health care teams
Living With Persistent Respiratory Symptoms of Long Covid
Fostering Hope
Mom, You Don’t Get It”
Explaining the process of formation of ageism among the iranian older adults
Causes and Consequences of Iranian Elite Athletes’ International Migrations
Inequities in the delivery of mental health care
Using Grounded Theory Method in Social Media Studies
Patients' and family members' perspectives on the benefits and working mechanisms of family nursing conversations in Dutch home healthcare
Toward a Deep Insight into Employee Participation in Employer-Supported Volunteering in Iranian Organizations
Deteriorating care home residents as 'matter out of place' in both care homes and hospitals
Hunting to Feel Human, the Process of Women’s Help-Seeking for Suicidality After Intimate Partner Violence
Acquired Brain Injuries and Intimate Partner Violence
Reflecting on Reporting Guidelines in Qualitative Inquiry
Constructivist Grounded Theory or Interpretive Phenomenology? Methodological Choices Within Specific Study Contexts
The Utility of Constructivist Grounded Theory in Critical Policy Analysis
Comparisons of Adaptations in Grounded Theory and Phenomenology
Making Conscientious Decisions
How to Save a Life
Being Uncertain
Migration Experiences and Mental Health of Older Latin American Immigrants in Australia
| Unique citing works | 27 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3.86 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 27 |