They Should Be Asking Us”
A Qualitative Decisional Needs Assessment for Women Considering Cervical Cancer Screening
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15736610 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Brianne Wood (0000-0001-9958-4824, University of Ottawa, corresponding author), Virginia L Russell (University of Manitoba), Ziad El‐Khatib (Karolinska Institutet), Ziad El-Khatib (0000-0003-0756-7280, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden), Susan McFaul (University of Ottawa), Monica Taljaard (0000-0002-3978-8961, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute), Julian Little (0000-0001-5026-5531, University of Ottawa), Ian D Graham (0000-0002-3669-1216, University of Ottawa) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Pages | 2333393618783632-2333393618783632 |
| Publication date | 2018-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Global Qualitative Nursing Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2333-3936 • E-ISSN: 2333-3936 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/2333393618783632 |
| PMID | 30014003 |
| OpenAlex | W2811506400 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 59 |
In this study, we examine from multiple perspectives, women's shared decision-making needs when considering cervical screening options: Pap testing, in-clinic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, self-collected HPV testing, or no screening. The Ottawa Decision Support Framework guided the development of the interview schedule. We conducted semi-structured interviews with seven screen-eligible women and five health care professionals (three health care providers and two health system managers). Women did not perceive that cervical screening involves a "decision," which limited their knowledge of options, risks, and benefits. Women and health professionals emphasized how a trusted primary care provider can support women making a choice among cervical screening modalities. Having all cervical screening options recommended and funded was perceived as an important step to facilitate shared decision making. Supporting women in making preference-based decisions in cervical cancer screening may increase screening among those who do not undergo screening regularly and decrease uptake in women who are over-screened
Alternative medicine · Cancer · Cancer screening · Cervical cancer · Cervical cancer screening · Cervical screening · Decision aids · Family medicine · Gynecology · Health care · Human papillomavirus · Modalities · Pap test · Preference · Qualitative research · Cervical Cancer and HPV Research · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Medicine · Nursing · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Decisions with Multiple Objectives
The Effects of Framing, Reflection, Probability, and Payoff on Risk Preference in Choice Tasks
What we say and what we do
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
What The Evidence Shows About Patient Activation
Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale
The qualitative content analysis process
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Shedding the cobra effect
Self-collected HPV Testing Improves Participation in Cervical Cancer Screening
Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research
Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Qualitative Content Analysis
How Many Interviews Are Enough
Unsatisfactory Saturation
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |