Should One Kind of Freedom Be Restricted to Promote Another
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15745281 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Katherine J Feder (0000-0003-4943-5710, University of Michigan, corresponding author), Janice Firn (0000-0002-4668-1011, University of Michigan), Ryan Stork (The University of Texas Health Science Center) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | E305-310 |
| Publication date | 2021-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The AMA Journal of Ethic (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2376-6980 • E-ISSN: 2376-6980 |
| Publisher | American Medical Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1001/amajethics.2021.305 |
| PMID | 33950825 |
| OpenAlex | W3145739420 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 1 |
Due to restraints' consequences for personal liberty and dignity, the threshold to apply restraints is understandably high and heavily regulated. However, there can be clinical scenarios in which restraint use can facilitate a patient's freedom. This article considers such a case and examines conditions under which using restraints offers therapeutic benefit for patients with traumatic brain injuries
Computer Science · Free Will and Agency · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |