Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Why the Post- Roe Era Requires Protecting Conscientious Provision as We Protect Conscientious Refusal in Health Care

Bibliographic Data

ID15746166
AuthorsIsa Ryan (0009-0000-2367-0179, NorthShore University HealthSystem, corresponding author), Ashish Premkumar (0000-0001-6952-9955, Northwestern University), Katie Watson (0000-0003-3609-4048, Northwestern University)
Year2022
Volume24
Issue9
PagesE906-912
Publication date2022-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe AMA Journal of Ethic (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2376-6980 • E-ISSN: 2376-6980
PublisherAmerican Medical Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1001/amajethics.2022.906
PMID36170425
OpenAlexW4298088188
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited3

The US Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade in June 2022, and now each state's legislature will decide if and when its citizens will have legal access to abortion care and if and when its physicians will be criminalized for providing what is considered to be the standard of care by multiple health-related organizations. This extraordinary change in the medico-legal landscape requires reevaluation of health profession codes of ethics related to clinician conscience. This article argues that these codes must now be expanded to address 2 newly critical areas: physician advocacy to make abortion illegal and affirmative protection for "conscientious provision" in hostile environments on par with protection of conscientious refusal

Abortion · Conscience · Conscientious objector · Health care · Legislature · Political science · Spanish Civil War · State (computer science · Supreme court · Law · Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues · Medicine · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Torture, Ethics, and Law

  • Are Conscientious Refusal and Conscientious Provision Mutually Exclusive? A Critique of Kelusa and Giubilini's Argument

    Open Access•Tzofit Ofengenden•Bioethics•2026

  • Why the Post- Roe Era Requires Protecting Conscientious Provision as We Protect Conscientious Refusal in Health Care

    Open Access•Isa Ryan, Ashish Premkumar et al.•The AMA Journal of Ethic•2022

  • The Comparative Safety of Legal Induced Abortion and Childbirth in the United States

    Elizabeth G Raymond, David A Grimes•Obstetrics and Gynecology•2012

  • Maternal mortality rates in the United States, 2021

    Donna L Hoyert, Donna Hoyert•2023

  • Why the Post- Roe Era Requires Protecting Conscientious Provision as We Protect Conscientious Refusal in Health Care

    Open Access•Isa Ryan, Ashish Premkumar et al.•The AMA Journal of Ethic•2022

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae