Advancing Ethical Neuroscience Research
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15746809 |
|---|---|
| Authors | B Rashmi Borah (United States International Trade Commission, corresponding author), Nicolle Strand (Office of Patient Care Services), Kata Chillag (0000-0002-0147-3032, United States International Trade Commission) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 1192-1198 |
| Publication date | 2016-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The AMA Journal of Ethic (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2376-6980 • E-ISSN: 2376-6980 |
| Publisher | American Medical Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.12.nlit1-1612 |
| PMID | 28009245 |
| OpenAlex | W2559970736 |
| Language | EN |
As neuroscience research advances, researchers, clinicians, and other stakeholders will face a host of ethical challenges. The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues (Bioethics Commission) has published two reports that provide recommendations on how to advance research endeavors ethically. The commission addressed, among other issues, how to prioritize different types of neuroscience research and how to include research participants who have impaired consent capacity. The Bioethics Commission's recommendations provide a foundation for ethical guidelines as neuroscience research advances and progresses
Bioethics · Commission · Engineering ethics · Ethical issues · Face (sociological concept · Foundation (evidence · Neuroethics · Political science · Research ethics · Social science · Sociology · Engineering · Ethics in Clinical Research · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Law · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Neuroscience · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|