Does a history with sexual assault impact bystander intervention engagement
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15749080 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul Branscum (0000-0002-3335-8282, Miami University, corresponding author), Gwen Hirko (Miami University), Sarah Rush‐Griffin (Long Island University), Christine L Hackman (0000-0002-9410-3099, California Polytechnic State University) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 40-57 |
| Publication date | 2024-07-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Gender-Based Violence (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2398-6808 • E-ISSN: 2398-6816 |
| Publisher | Policy Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1332/23986808y2024d000000039 |
| OpenAlex | W4400379144 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 24 |
Bystander intervention is a method of sexual violence prevention aimed at reducing the serious and pervasive issue of sexual assault on college campuses. The current study utilises the reasoned action approach (RAA) to examine potential differences in bystander intervention engagement between college students with exposure or experience related to sexual assault to students with no such history. Students (n=290) from two mid-sized universities completed a survey examining the RAA constructs (instrumental and experiential attitudes, injunctive and descriptive norms, capacity and autonomy), their sexual assault knowledge, and anticipated regret in reference to bystander intervention. Results showed that participants with exposure or experience related to sexual assault had significantly higher behavioural intentions (p=.018; d=.31), instrumental attitudes (p<.001; d=.55), injunctive norms (p=.026; d=.29), capacity (p=.002; d=.40), autonomy (p=.022; d=.28), anticipated regret (p<.001; d=.56), and sexual assault knowledge (p=.018; d=.31). The RAA constructs also explained a significant amount of the variance of intentions for both groups (with exposure/experience adjust R2 =.501; without exposure/experience adjust R2 =.660). The RAA constructs and anticipated regret appear to be important predictors to consider when planning bystander intervention programmes aimed at reducing sexual assault on college campuses
Bystander effect · Criminology · Intervention (counseling · Medical emergency · Poison control · Psychiatry · Sexual assault · Sexual violence · Suicide prevention · Clinical Psychology · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Medicine · Psychology · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies · Social Psychology
Cognitive Empathy and Emotional Empathy in Human Behavior and Evolution
Sexual assault victimization and psychopathology
Multi - College Bystander Intervention Evaluation for Violence Prevention
Anticipated regret as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour
Bystander Education Training for Campus Sexual Assault Prevention
Anticipated regret and health behavior
A Theory of Regret Regulation 1.0
Statistical Power Analysis
Does a report = support? A qualitative analysis of college sexual assault survivors’ Title IX Office knowledge, perceptions, and experiences
Who will help prevent sexual violence
Measurement and Correlates of Prosocial Bystander Behavior
Rape Myth Beliefs and Bystander Attitudes Among Incoming College Students
Perceived Moral Norms in an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior in Predicting University Students’ Bystander Intentions toward Relational Bullying
The grey zone of collegiate sexual regret
Men who intervene to prevent sexual assault
Predicting Bystander Efficacy and Willingness to Intervene in College Men and Women
Evaluation of Green Dot
The Effects of Receiving a Rape Disclosure
A Situational Model of Sexual Assault Prevention through Bystander Intervention
Predicting Bystander Behavior to Prevent Sexual Assault on College Campuses
The role of moral norms as a determinant of intentions to engage in bystander intervention to prevent sexual assault
Evaluating the One-in-Five Statistic
Victim Ambiguity
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |