Dialects of Written Arabic
Syntactic differences in the treatment of object pronouns in Egyptian and Levantine newspapers
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16643446 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Wilmsen (0000-0003-0432-3600, 1American University of Beirut, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 99-128 |
| Publication date | 2010-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Arabica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0570-5398 • E-ISSN: 1570-0585 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1163/057053910x12625688929228 |
| OpenAlex | W2003689758 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
Despite the notion that written Arabic is invariable across the Arab world, a few researchers, using large corpora to discover patterns of usage, have demonstrated regional differences in Arabic writing. While most such research has focussed upon the lexicon, this corpus-based study examines a syntactic difference between Egyptian and Levantine writing: the treatment of object pronouns. A search of an entire year of writing in regional newspapers found that Levantine writers tend to use the free object pronoun iyyā-, placing the direct object after the indirect, about twice as often as Egyptian writers do, who for their part prefer to place the direct object before the indirect. A proposed reason for this is that the free object pronoun is used to mark the direct object in spoken Levantine vernaculars but not in Egyptian. This seems to indicate that local spoken vernaculars exert a fundamental influence on writing
Arabic · Lexicon · Linguistics · Media studies · Newspaper · Object (grammar · Object pronoun · Pronoun · Sociology · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Computer Science · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,09 |
| Citation span | 1970 - 2021 (52) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |