Sexual Harassment and Employer Liability

A Critical Analysis of the South African Legal Position

Bibliographic Data

ID16766487
AuthorsMohamed Alli Chicktay (corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume54
Issue2
Pages283-297
Publication date2010-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of African Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0221-8553 • E-ISSN: 1464-3731
PublisherCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/s0021855310000082
OpenAlexW2122815908
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited1

On 27 April 1994 South Africans adopted a new constitution, with founding values of dignity, equality and freedom. Despite the new constitution, the majority of women remain victims within the workplace. They still find themselves a minority within senior management and are often subjected to sexual harassment. Women are either denied work opportunities for refusing to give in to a perpetrator's sexual advances or they are forced to work in an unpleasant environment that severely infringes on their dignity. There are five legal options available to victims of sexual harassment within the South African workplace. These are claims against the employer for: vicarious liability; automatically unfair dismissal; unfair labour practices; failing to create a safe working environment; and violating the Employment Equity Act. This article examines the strengths and weaknesses of these legal actions. It also makes further suggestions aimed at curbing workplace sexual harassment within South Africa

Business · Constitution · Criminology · Dignity · Dismissal · Harassment · Labour law · Liability · Political science · Sociology · Unfair dismissal · Vicarious liability · Work (physics) · Engineering · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Law · Legal Issues in South Africa · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub