Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Empowered service users

Peer workers co-production in Norwegian mental health and substance use services

Bibliographic Data

ID16775666
AuthorsKristina Bakke Åkerblom (0000-0002-0610-3794, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, corresponding author), Jonathan Q Tritter (0000-0001-6258-4628, Nord University)
Year2025
Volume27
Issue6
Pages1652-1674
Publication date2025-06-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Management Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1471-9037 • E-ISSN: 1471-9045
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14719037.2024.2397471
OpenAlexW4402134757
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited47

Employing citizens with first-hand experience as ‘peer workers’ (PW) is increasingly prevalent in mental health and substance use organizations. This Norwegian qualitative exploratory study presents three benefits of PWs identified by managers, health professionals and PWs: empowered co-production, fluid positions, and catalysing cultural change. PWs have less clearly defined roles but can exercise discretion and autonomy. As service user experts, they often have direct access to management and can promote change in professional practice in multidisciplinary settings. PWs have the potential to catalyse change and increase legitimacy and trust, but greater attention is needed to strategies that support their integration

Business · Economics · Mental health · Mental health service · Norwegian · Peer review · Political science · Psychiatry · Public relations · Substance use · Community Health and Development · Health Policy Implementation Science · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology · Marketing

  • Conditions for involving vulnerable citizens in co-production

    Open Access•Menno Hoppen, Taco Brandsen et al.•Public Management Review•2026

  • Understanding co-production with vulnerable populations

    Open Access•Angelica Zazzera, Denita Cepiku•Public Management Review•2026

  • Co-production in mental health care, research, and education

    Open Access•Dagim Dawit Gonsamo, Herman Hay Ming Lo et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2026

  • Public Governance as Co-creation

    Open Access•Christopher Ansell, Jacob Torfing•Public Governance As Co-Creation•2021

  • A systematic review of influences on implementation of peer support work for adults with mental health problems

    Open Access•Nashwa Ibrahim, Dean M Thompson et al.•Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric…•2020

  • The Dark Side of Co-Creation and Co-Production

    Open Access•Trui Steen, Taco Brandsen et al.•2018

  • The Multiple Facets of Co-Production

    Jonathan Alford, John Alford•Public Management Review•2014

  • Collaborative innovation in the public sector

    Jacob Torfing•Public Management Review•2019

  • ‘Collective making’ as knowledge mobilisation

    Open Access•Joe Langley, Daniel Wolstenholme et al.•BMC Health Services Research•2018

  • Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services

    Stephen P Osborne, Zoe Radnor et al.•Public Management Review•2016

  • “Sticky Information” and the Locus of Problem Solving

    Open Access•Eric Von Hippel•Management Science•1994

  • Co-design

    Open Access•Jakob Trischler, Timo Dietrich et al.•Public Management Review•2019

  • Systematic text condensation

    Open Access•Kirsti Malterud•Scandinavian Journal of Public…•2012

  • Lead Users

    Open Access•Eric Von Hippel•Management Science•1986

  • Health equity in England

    Open Access•Michael Marmot•BMJ•2020

  • A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production

    W H Voorberg, V J J M Bekkers et al.•Public Management Review•2015

  • Public values? A systematic literature review into the outcomes of public service co-creation

    Léon Acar, Trui Steen et al.•Public Management Review•2025

  • Facing the human capital crisis

    Open Access•Mette Jakobsen, Ann‐Kristina Løkke et al.•Public Administration Review•2023

  • Co-producing Randomized Controlled Trials

    Open Access•Lucy Goldsmith, Rosaleen Morshead et al.•Frontiers in Sociology•2019

  • The birdcage is open, but will the bird fly? How interactional and institutional trust interplay in public organisations

    Tina Øllgaard Bentzen•Journal of Trust Research•2019

  • The work of exemplary practitioners in neighborhood governance

    Open Access•Merlijn Van Hulst, Laurens De Graaf et al.•Critical Policy Studies•2012

  • Co-producing Public Welfare Services with Vulnerable Citizens

    Open Access•Marianne Staal Stougaard•Voluntas Revista Internacional de…•2020

  • Towards a principle of most-deeply affected

    Open Access•Afsoun Afsahi•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2022

  • How to systematically analyze co‐production to inform future policies? Introducing 5Ws of co‐production

    Open Access•Artur Steiner, Jean Farmer et al.•Public Administration Review•2022

  • We're not there to lead”

    Open Access•Caitlin Mcmullin•Public Administration Review•2023

  • Neutralized, enhanced, tokenistic

    Open Access•Trishna Chauhan, Charlotte Croft et al.•Public Administration•2022

  • Boundary Spanners in Public Management and Governance

    Ingmar Van Meerkerk, Jurian Edelenbos•Boundary Spanners in Public…•2018

  • Representative bureaucracy and organizational attractiveness

    Open Access•Karen Johnston, Federica Alberti et al.•Public Administration Review•2023

  • Collaborative Public Management and Democracy

    Open Access•William D Leach•Public Administration Review•2006

  • Varieties of Participation in Public Services

    Open Access•Tina Nabatchi, Alessandro Sancino et al.•Public Administration Review•2017

  • The All-Affected Principle and the Question of Asymmetry

    Open Access•Andreas Bengtson•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • Measuring and assessing the effects of collaborative innovation in crime prevention

    Jacob Torfing, Andreas Hagedorn Krogh et al.•Policy & Politics•2020

  • A paradox in healthcare service development

    Open Access•Nellie El Enany, Graeme Currie et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2013

  • Moving from rational to normative ideologies of control over public involvement

    Open Access•Charlotte Croft, Graeme Currie et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2016

  • Alignments and differentiations

    Open Access•Marjaana Jones, Ilkka Pietilä•Health An Interdisciplinary…•2020

Unique citing works3
Citations per year3
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae