Cost-effectiveness analysis of natural birth and elective C-section in supplemental health

Bibliographic Data

ID16780274
AuthorsAline Piovezan Entringer (0000-0003-4639-6197, Instituto Nacional de Saúde), Márcia Pinto (0000-0001-7568-5014, Instituto Nacional de Saúde), Maria Aparecida Mezzalira Gomes (0000-0001-5908-1763, Instituto Nacional de Saúde), Maria Auxiliadora De Souza Mendes Gomes
Year2018
Volume52
Pages91
Publication date2018-11-14
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRevista de Saúde Pública (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0034-8910 • E-ISSN: 0034-8910
PublisherUniversidade de Sao Paulo, Agencia USP de Gestao da Informacao Academica (AGUIA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052000373
PMID30484479
OpenAlexW2902396290
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited5

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of natural childbirth and elective C-section for normal risk pregnant women. METHODS: The study was conducted from the perspective of supplemental health, a health subsystem that finances private obstetric care, represented in Brazil by health plan operators. The reference populations were normal risk pregnant women, who could undergo natural childbirth or elective C-section, subdivided into primiparous and multiparous women with previous uterine scar. A decision analysis model was constructed including choice of delivery types and health consequences for mother and newborn, from admission for delivery to maternity hospital discharge. Effectiveness measures were identified from the scientific literature, and cost data obtained by consultation with health professionals, health plan operators’ pricing tables, and pricing reference publications of health resources. RESULTS: Natural childbirth was dominant compared with elective C-section for primiparous normal risk pregnant women, presenting lower cost (R$5,210.96 versus R$5,753.54) and better or equal effectiveness for all evaluated outcomes. For multiparous women with previous uterine scar, C-section presented lower cost (R$5,364.07) than natural childbirth (R$5,632.24), and better or equal effectiveness; therefore, C-section is more efficient for this population. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to control and audit C-sections without clinical indication, especially with regard to primiparous women, contributing to the management of perinatal care

Audit · Business · Childbirth · Environmental health · Health care · Health plan · Natural childbirth · Obstetrics · Population · Pregnancy · Accounting · Breastfeeding Practices and Influences · Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions · Medicine · Nursing

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access