The current state of integrating equity, diversity and inclusion into knowledge mobilization
A systematic literature review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16897739 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tracelyn Cornelius-Hernandez (0009-0003-4186-3822, University of Waterloo), Amelia Clarke (0000-0003-0166-3204, University of Waterloo) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 865-885 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-14 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Equal Opportunities International (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1758-7093 • E-ISSN: 2040-7149 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/edi-04-2023-0134 |
| OpenAlex | W4401583801 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 60 |
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to systematically review and analyze the academic literature on integrating equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) into knowledge mobilization (KMb). Design/methodology/approach This systematic literature review of the body of scholarly literature published on integrating EDI with KMb follows established methods and protocols proposed by Popay et al. (2006) and Page et al. (2021). Using a relevant keyword string, a search was conducted in ProQuest and SCOPUS to find peer-reviewed articles, which were then screened using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, inductive and deductive analyses were conducted on the selected articles. Findings The findings suggest that most of the authors are based in the Global North, the majority of literature was published in the last two years, and that it is conceptual. This synthesis highlights five solution-oriented themes: acknowledging inherent bias, centering marginalized groups, promoting responsible knowledge mobilization, establishing partnerships, and advocating for transformational and systemic change. This study also identifies four broad barriers: inherent, unconscious, and implicit biases, a lack of evidence-based best practices, siloing of research and information, and a lack of institutional support and resources. Findings also highlight the value of further research into barriers, gaps and opportunities. Originality/value By studying the intersection of EDI and KMb, this contemporary synthesis of the state of the field presents opportunities for future research into gaps, barriers and potential solutions
Knowledge management · Originality · Political science · Public relations · Scopus · Social science · Sociology · Systematic review · Community Development and Social Impact · Computer Science · Microfinance and Financial Inclusion · Psychology · Social Capital and Networks
Empirical Research and Writing
Public engagement with science—Origins, motives and impact in academic literature and science policy
Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases
Designing conceptual articles
Environmental governance and its implications for conservation practice
‘Collective making’ as knowledge mobilisation
Diversity at a Critical Juncture
The PRISMA 2020 statement
Black Feminist Thought, 30th Anniversary Edition
Co-Designing for Equity in Informal Science Learning
A Systematic Map of Inclusion, Equity and Diversity in Science Communication Research
Situating the Scientist
Moving Toward Inclusion
Scientific Institutions Should Support Inclusive Engagement
Science for All? Practical Recommendations on Reaching Underserved Audiences
Science Communication Demands a Critical Approach That Centers Inclusion, Equity, and Intersectionality
Communicating science in higher education and research institutions
Researching on inclusive education in Spain
Feeling Left Out
An unfinished journey? Reflections on a decade of responsible research and innovation
Intersectionality, health equity, and EDI
Responsible Research and Innovation Training Programs
Building inclusive and democratic schools in Spain
Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review
Getting at Equality
Ensuring Rigor in Qualitative Data Analysis
Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |