Contract or Treaty? The Daʿʿan Agreement of 1911 and the limits on Imam Yahya’s authority
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16908683 |
|---|---|
| Authors | M Şükrü Hanioğlu (Ion Exchange (India), corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 25-46 |
| Publication date | 2018-01-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Arabian Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2153-4764 • E-ISSN: 2153-4780 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/21534764.2018.1529223 |
| OpenAlex | W2919668503 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 3 |
A seminal flashpoint in the scholarly discussion of the post-1872 relationship between the Ottoman empire and its province of Yemen is the Daʿʿan Agreement of 1911. Previous scholarship studying this agreement and its historical context insists that the Ottoman government conceded administrative authority to Imām Yaḥyā Ḥamīd al-Dīn bordering on independence across a vast portion of the Province of Yemen. This study asserts otherwise. The devolution bestowed upon him was far more limited, and the Ottoman authorities never treated him as a leader on equal footing with them. They granted autonomy solely on a contractual basis which could be annulled by the authorizing party, not by a treaty to be adhered to by all contracting parties. The article examines the relations between Imām Yaḥyā and the Ottoman Government beginning with the Zaydī leader’s de facto control over the Jibāl, or the highlands within Upper Yemen. It focuses on the preparations and implementation for the contract of Daʿʿan and discusses Imām Yaḥyā’s status following the contract and the nature of his authority over the region delimited by this agreement
Archaeology · Autonomy · Context (archaeology · Devolution (biology · Government (linguistics · Independence (probability theory · Political science · Treaty · Archaeology and Historical Studies · History · Islamic Studies and History · Law · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |