Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Self-Leadership Questionnaire for Nursing Students
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16910544 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hye-Ja Park (0000-0002-8923-2611), Hye‐Ja Park (CHA University), Sun-Ki Kim, Sunki Kim (0000-0001-5385-7604, CHA University), Soyoung Yu (0000-0001-6327-5747, CHA University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | SAGE Open (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/21582440241239786 |
| OpenAlex | W4393239795 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 39 |
Online self-learning became widespread after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and during this period, learners’ self-leadership became an important measure of their competency. This study aims to verify the validity and reliability of the tool by translating the Abbreviated Self-Leadership Questionnaire (ASLQ) into Korean. Through web-based surveys, 286 nursing students from two university nursing colleges participated in the study. Cronbach’s α, correlation, and confirmatory factor analyses were used to verify the nine-item ASLQ. The factor loading values ranged from 0.378 to 0.892. The ASLQ model fit had a comparative fit index of 0.944, root mean square error of approximation of 0.093, and standardized root mean residual of 0.069. The ASLQ showed a statistically significant positive correlation with the original self-leadership, emotional intelligence, and self-efficacy questionnaires. Additionally, structural, convergent, and criterion validity were also evident. The reliability of the ASLQ was 0.846 for Cronbach’s α (the three sub-dimensions were 0.836, 0.732, and 0.734). This study verified the validity and reliability of the ASLQ and confirmed that it could be used to measure the self-leadership of nursing students at a time when self-leadership is crucial
Medical education · Psychometrics · Validity · Applied Psychology · Clinical Psychology · Education and Learning Interventions · Health and Wellbeing Research · Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Social Psychology
Measurement in Medicine
Quality of Life
The Cosmin study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes
Cutoff criteria for overall model fit indexes in generalized structured component analysis
Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations
Two decades of self‐leadership theory and research
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Social Interest Index
Cosmin Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
A study to assess the reliability and construct validity of the Abbreviated Self-leadership Questionnaire
Validity and Reliability of the Korean version of the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale for Nurses
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |