Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Platform Training and Learning by Doing and Gig Workers’ Incomes

Empirical Evidence From China’s Food Delivery Riders

Bibliographic Data

ID16911684
AuthorsQi Zheng (0000-0003-3838-046X, Capital University of Economics and Business, corresponding author), Jing Zhan (0000-0002-7339-6267, Capital University of Economics and Business), Xinying Xu (0000-0001-5968-5989, University of International Business and Economics)
Year2024
Volume14
Issue3
Publication date2024-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSAGE Open (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/21582440241284555
OpenAlexW4402897514
LanguageEN
References cited24

This study focuses on the different impacts of platform training and learning by doing on gig workers’ platform income. Based on survey data of China’s delivery riders on the platform in 2020, via quantitative methods combined with the case study, it is found that the platform training is negatively correlated with riders’ incomes, while learning by doing is positively correlated with their incomes. Workers with a high level of platform-income dependence earn more than those with an average level of dependence under the same platform training, or learning by doing. Overall, the incomes of the former are significantly lower than those of the latter, where the difference is mainly due to unobservable factors. Both platform training and learning by doing significantly reduce the income gap. In addition, the instrumental variable and the propensity score matching approaches are introduced to handle the endogeneity problem, and robust results are obtained

Business · China · Empirical evidence · Food delivery · Geography · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Employment and Welfare Studies · Psychology · Retirement, Disability, and Employment · Marketing

  • Algorithms that Divide and Unite

    Open Access•Vili Lehdonvirta•Space, Place and Global Digital…•2016

  • “Making Out” While Driving

    Lindsey D Cameron•Organization Science•2022

  • Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets

    Ronald L Oaxaca, Ronald Oaxaca•International Economic Review•1973

  • “Is your gig any good?” Analysing job quality in the Australian platform-based food-delivery sector

    Open Access•Caleb Goods, Alex Veen et al.•Journal of Industrial Relations•2019

  • Does the sharing economy increase inequality within the eighty percent

    Juliet B Schor•Cambridge Journal of Regions…•2016

  • The Value of Flexible Work

    M Keith Chen, Judith A Chevalier et al.•Journal of Political Economy•2018

  • The Journal of International Communication

    Naren Chitty, Li Ji et al.•Review of Communication•2011

  • Labour process theory and the gig economy

    Open Access•Alessandro Gandini•Human Relations•2018

  • Precarious Work, Insecure Workers

    Open Access•A L Kalleberg•American Sociological Review•2009

  • Consequences of Routine Work-Schedule Instability for Worker Health and Well-Being

    Open Access•D Schneider, K Harknett•American Sociological Review•2019

  • Work Precarity and Gig Literacies in Online Freelancing

    Open Access•Will Sutherland, Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi et al.•Work Employment and Society•2020

  • When the stomach is full we look for respect

    Open Access•W Monteith, Lena Giesbert•Work Employment and Society•2017

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae