Platform Training and Learning by Doing and Gig Workers’ Incomes
Empirical Evidence From China’s Food Delivery Riders
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16911684 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Qi Zheng (0000-0003-3838-046X, Capital University of Economics and Business, corresponding author), Jing Zhan (0000-0002-7339-6267, Capital University of Economics and Business), Xinying Xu (0000-0001-5968-5989, University of International Business and Economics) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2024-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | SAGE Open (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/21582440241284555 |
| OpenAlex | W4402897514 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 24 |
This study focuses on the different impacts of platform training and learning by doing on gig workers’ platform income. Based on survey data of China’s delivery riders on the platform in 2020, via quantitative methods combined with the case study, it is found that the platform training is negatively correlated with riders’ incomes, while learning by doing is positively correlated with their incomes. Workers with a high level of platform-income dependence earn more than those with an average level of dependence under the same platform training, or learning by doing. Overall, the incomes of the former are significantly lower than those of the latter, where the difference is mainly due to unobservable factors. Both platform training and learning by doing significantly reduce the income gap. In addition, the instrumental variable and the propensity score matching approaches are introduced to handle the endogeneity problem, and robust results are obtained
Business · China · Empirical evidence · Food delivery · Geography · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Employment and Welfare Studies · Psychology · Retirement, Disability, and Employment · Marketing
Algorithms that Divide and Unite
“Making Out” While Driving
Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets
“Is your gig any good?” Analysing job quality in the Australian platform-based food-delivery sector
Does the sharing economy increase inequality within the eighty percent
The Value of Flexible Work
The Journal of International Communication
Labour process theory and the gig economy
Precarious Work, Insecure Workers
Consequences of Routine Work-Schedule Instability for Worker Health and Well-Being
Work Precarity and Gig Literacies in Online Freelancing
When the stomach is full we look for respect
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |