Participatory democracy in dynamic contexts
A review of regional transmission organization governance in the United States
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16929333 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephanie Lenhart (0000-0003-1163-9427, Boise State University, corresponding author), Dalten Fox (0000-0002-7956-0531, Boise State University) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 83 |
| Pages | 102345 |
| Publication date | 2022-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Energy Research & Social Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2214-6296 • E-ISSN: 2214-6326 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102345 |
| OpenAlex | W4200327969 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 29 |
In the United States, electricity law delineates authority across federal and state jurisdictions, yet many essential electricity system functions are organized at a regional-scale. Seven regional transmission organizations (RTOs) ensure open access to transmission, manage wholesale electricity markets, and maintain transmission system reliability. Each RTO has distinct decision-making processes that emerged from political negotiations and regional contexts. Drawing on participatory governance and institutional design literature, the paper compares RTOs across governance structures and participatory and power dimensions. This research increases the visibility of the existing balance of power in RTO governance, assesses the public interest accountability of current designs, and offers insights for understanding interactive governance in highly technical settings involving new and old industry actors and a growing number of public and civil society actors. The structures and participation practices established to enable regulatory restructuring and economic efficiencies are not necessarily suited to the current challenges of innovating new market, operating, and planning approaches for the future grid. Identifying barriers to participation, examining how different actors exercise power, and systematically assessing the rationale and purposes for various design choices can suggest ways to improve governance effectiveness, legitimacy, or fairness. This assessment suggests several opportunities for strengthening RTO governance. However, governance design in complex and dynamic systems is an ongoing challenge that will require organizational resilience in response to new challenges and adaptation as energy systems evolve
Accountability · Business · Citizen journalism · Civil society · Corporate governance · Legitimacy · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Restructuring · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Policy and Administration Research · Regulation and Compliance Studies · Finance
Power
Electricity governance and the Western energy imbalance market in the United States
Community and Cooperation
Augmenting the IAD framework to reveal power in collaborative governance – An illustrative application to resource industry dominated processes
Addressing the Citizenship and Democratic Deficits
Exploring How Institutional Arrangements Shape Stakeholder Influence on Policy Decisions
Democracy and Governance Networks
On the Weights of Nations
Conceptualizing energy democracy
Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance
Putting the “Public” Back in Public Values Research
Putting the Public Back into Governance
Inside Collaborative Networks
Continuous Institutional Innovation and the Pragmatic Conception of Democracy
The Strategic Action Field Framework for Policy Implementation Research
The Environmental Performance of Participatory and Collaborative Governance
Unpacking the Collaborative Toolbox
Evaluating Stakeholder Participation and Influence on State‐Level Rulemaking
An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |