How Valid Is Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory to Explain Physical Activity Behavior
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16945581 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Viktoria S Egele (0000-0003-4354-6751, Saarland University, corresponding author), Eric Klopp (0000-0002-6638-8912, Saarland University), Robin Stark (0000-0002-3807-2355, Saarland University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 20 |
| Publication date | 2025-02-06 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2174-8144 • E-ISSN: 2254-9625 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ejihpe15020020 |
| PMID | 39997084 |
| OpenAlex | W4407196004 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 35 |
(1) Background: Although social cognitive theory (SCT) has been widely tested and applied in numerous interventions aimed at optimizing physical activity behavior, the complete theory has rarely been tested in its entirety. Only selected elements have been tested, and specific samples, some of them pathological, have been studied rather than the general population, for whom a lack of physical activity is a huge problem. The present study addresses these two research gaps and tests the tenability of the theoretical assumptions of SCT to explain physical activity behavior in the general population. (2) Methods: A total of 194 German adults (109 male, 85 female) with a mean age of 26.03 years (SD = 10.33) completed two validated questionnaires concerning their expressions on SCT components (t1) and their physical activity (t2). SCT was modeled using a structural equation model with latent variables. (3) Results: The results showed the very good fit of the structural model, indicating that the theoretically stated relations between the constructs in SCT seem to be corroborated, despite some paths seeming to be more important than others. (4) Conclusions: The use of SCT to explain and predict behavior can be seen as justified, even though it once again appears that some aspects (i.e., self-efficacy) are more crucial than others
Cognition · Developmental psychology · Latent variable · Physical activity · Physical therapy · Population · Psychological intervention · Social cognitive theory · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Eating Disorders and Behaviors · Mathematics · Medicine · Mental Health Research Topics · Psychology · Social Psychology
The effect of physical activity on altruistic behaviour among university students
Exercise Perceptions, Barriers, and Self-Efficacy Among Adults in Kuwait During the Covid-19 Pandemic
The sports-education-health nexus
Latent profiles of labor literacy among Chinese undergraduates
Unlocking Action
Enhancing physical activity, knowledge, and self-efficacy in adolescents
How big is the physical activity intention–behaviour gap? A meta‐analysis using the action control framework
National, regional, and global trends in insufficient physical activity among adults from 2000 to 2022
Social cognitive theory and physical activity
Understanding the intention-behavior gap
Physical activity and risk of breast cancer, colon cancer, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, and ischemic stroke events
Health Promotion by Social Cognitive Means
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
Self-efficacy
Assessing Outcome Expectations in Older Adults
Depressive symptoms, perceived stress, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations
Operationalization of the social cognitive theory to explain and predict physical activity in Germany
| Citations per year | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |