La doctrina de la soberanía dual en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16965674 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Javier Escobar Veas (0000-0001-9266-0396, Bocconi University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 1503-1540 |
| Publication date | 2020-10-27 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2359-3881 • E-ISSN: 2525-510X |
| Publisher | Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (PUBLISHER • BR) |
| DOI | 10.22197/rbdpp.v6i3.297 |
| OpenAlex | W3096864774 |
| Language | ES |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 5 |
Under the dual sovereignty doctrine the Supreme Court has accepted that different sovereigns may prosecute an individual for the same facts without violating the double jeopardy clause if the act of the individual infringed the laws of each sovereignty. This article aims to analyze the evolution of the dual sovereignty doctrine in the case law of the Supreme Court of the United States. Although the doctrine has been highly criticized by scholars, the Supreme Court has persistently upheld it. . Besides, the article addresses the safeguards that currently exist against eventual abuses of the dual sovereignty doctrine, such as the “sham exception” and the “Petite Policy”. Finally, since the previous safeguards have been considered insufficient, the contribution briefly explores the possibility of applying the Eighth Amendment as an additional protection against eventual abuses committed under the dual sovereignty doctrine
Doctrine · Double jeopardy · Political science · Politics · Sovereignty · Supreme court · Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies · International Law and Aviation · Law · Legal processes and jurisprudence · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.17 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |