Neuromuscular control
From a biomechanist's perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16968993 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daanish M Mulla (McMaster University), Peter J Keir (0000-0002-9811-1547, McMaster University) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Pages | 1217009-1217009 |
| Publication date | 2023-07-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Sports and Active Living (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2624-9367 • E-ISSN: 2624-9367 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fspor.2023.1217009 |
| PMID | 37476161 |
| OpenAlex | W4383217607 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 275 |
Understanding neural control of movement necessitates a collaborative approach between many disciplines, including biomechanics, neuroscience, and motor control. Biomechanics grounds us to the laws of physics that our musculoskeletal system must obey. Neuroscience reveals the inner workings of our nervous system that functions to control our body. Motor control investigates the coordinated motor behaviours we display when interacting with our environment. The combined efforts across the many disciplines aimed at understanding human movement has resulted in a rich and rapidly growing body of literature overflowing with theories, models, and experimental paradigms. As a result, gathering knowledge and drawing connections between the overlapping but seemingly disparate fields can be an overwhelming endeavour. This review paper evolved as a need for us to learn of the diverse perspectives underlying current understanding of neuromuscular control. The purpose of our review paper is to integrate ideas from biomechanics, neuroscience, and motor control to better understand how we voluntarily control our muscles. As biomechanists, we approach this paper starting from a biomechanical modelling framework. We first define the theoretical solutions (i.e., muscle activity patterns) that an individual could feasibly use to complete a motor task. The theoretical solutions will be compared to experimental findings and reveal that individuals display structured muscle activity patterns that do not span the entire theoretical solution space. Prevalent neuromuscular control theories will be discussed in length, highlighting optimality, probabilistic principles, and neuromechanical constraints, that may guide individuals to families of muscle activity solutions within what is theoretically possible. Our intention is for this paper to serve as a primer for the neuromuscular control scientific community by introducing and integrating many of the ideas common across disciplines today, as well as inspire future work to improve the representation of neural control in biomechanical models
Biomechanics · Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Human–computer interaction · Motor Control · Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention · Computer Science · Medicine · Motor Control and Adaptation · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Neuroscience · Psychology · Anatomy · Artificial Intelligence
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |