Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Disenchantment of Secular Discourse

Bibliographic Data

ID16995987
AuthorsSteven D Smith (0000-0001-7417-8678, corresponding author), Steven D Smith-undifferentiated
Year2010
Pages304
Publication date2010-06-01
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueDisenchantment of Secular Discourse (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherHarvard University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2307/j.ctv1n1bshj
OpenAlexW4300351198
Open LibraryOL29659855M
ISBN9780674056862
LanguageEN
Citations received24

Prominent observers complain that public discourse in America is shallow and unedifying -- This debased conditions often attributed to, among other things, the resurgence of religion in public life. Steven D. Smith argues that this diagnosis has the matter backwards: it is not primarily religion but rather the strictures of secular rationalism that have drained our modern discourse of force and authenticity. Thus Rawlsian public reason filters appeals to religion or other comprehensive doctrines out of public deliberation. But these restrictions have the effect of excluding our deepest normative commitments, virtually assuring that the discourse will be shallow. Furthermore, because we cannot defend our normative positions without resorting to convictions that secular discourse deems inadmissible, we are frequently forced to smuggle in those convictions under the guise of benign notions such as freedom and equality. Smith suggests that this sort of smuggling is pervasive in modern secular discourse. He shows this by considering a series of controversial, contemporary issues, including the Supreme Court's assisted-suicide decisions, the harm principle, separation of church and state, and freedom of conscience. He concludes by suggesting that it is possible and desirable to free public discourse of the constraints associated with secularism and public reason

Disenchantment · Political science · Sociology · Law · Religion and Society Interactions · Discussion · Secularism

  • On the Idea of Public Reason

    Open Access•Jonathan Quong•A Companion to Rawls•2013

  • Norm, normal and disruption

    Open Access•Richard Mohr, Francesco Contini et al.•Oñati Socio-legal Series•2022

  • Whose Equality? Freedom of Religious Associations and Gaum v. Van Rensburg

    Open Access•Stéphane De Freitas, Shaun De Freitas•Journal of Law and Religion•2023

  • From the Sacred Canopy to the Haunted Vault

    Open Access•Ovamir Anjum•American Journal of Islamic…•2017

  • OKH Rising

    Open Access•Edwin Zehner•OKH Journal Anthropological…•2023

  • Migration, religion, and schooling in liberal democratic states

    Open Access•Robert Osburn•European Journal of Cultural and…•2018

  • Learning from diversity

    Open Access•Laura Siscoe•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2024

  • Compromise, pluralism, and deliberation

    Daniel Weinstock•Critical Review of International…•2017

  • Religious parties and the problem of democratic political legitimacy

    Bryan T Mcgraw•Critical Review of International…•2014

  • On Liberalism’s Religion

    Jean L Cohen•Critical Review of International…•2018

  • Rights Constitutionalism and the Challenge of Belonging

    Open Access•Dana Alexander•Law & Social Inquiry•2022

  • Re-enchanting meat

    Open Access•Christine Jeske•Agriculture and Human Values•2023

  • Re‐embedding Moral Agency

    Open Access•Christopher Steck•Journal of Religious Ethics•2013

  • Catholic Ethics as Seen From Padua

    Open Access•Christopher Steck•Journal of Religious Ethics•2011

  • International politics after secularism

    Open Access•Elizabeth Shakman Hurd•Review of International Studies•2012

  • Secularization and Modernization

    Open Access•J C D Clark•The Historical Journal•2012

  • Race, religion, and the political incorporation of Indian Americans

    P A Kurien, Prema Kurien•Journal of Religious and…•2016

  • Majority versus minority religious status and diasporic nationalism

    Open Access•P A Kurien, Prema Kurien•Nations and Nationalism•2017

  • An interpretation of political argument

    Open Access•William Bosworth•European Journal of Political…•2020

  • Aversion to and Understanding of God Talk in the Public Sphere

    Open Access•John H Evans•Journal for the Scientific Study…•2017

  • Fighting Rage with Fear

    Open Access•Shirin Deylami•Religions•2018

  • Theopolitics Contra Political Theology

    Open Access•Charles H T Lesch•American Political Science Review•2019

  • Newspaper Leaders as Moral Exhortation

    Open Access•Gregory Melleuish, Chavura Stephens et al.•Religions•2023

  • Religiously Engaged Ethnography

    Eloise Meneses•Ethnos•2021

Unique citing works24
Citations per year1,6
Citation span2011 - 2024 (14)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 24

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae